Peterson or Foster-Will answer yours! Please help! Draft Tomorrow

[redskin777 0]

Who should I take? Peterson is so consistant but Foster may have a better upside.

[Lamb of God 14]

I still like Foster, especially in a PPR but ya can't lose with AP if your worried about Foster's hammy. I think he'll have enough time in the next two weeks to heal up for week 1.

[420allstars 13]

I still like Foster, especially in a PPR but ya can't lose with AP if your worried about Foster's hammy. I think he'll have enough time in the next two weeks to heal up for week 1.

 

I agree completly, you cant really go wrong with either.. I took foster last week in my main re-draft league so thats my choice

 

I think he ceiling is higher and I prefer guys in offences that will score alot of points thru the air while still keeping true to the ground game.. just better balance for Foster

[redskin777 0]

Are you nervous about his hamstring? That injury tends to linger.

[redskin777 0]

my league is a redraft with PPR. 12 teams.

[redskin777 0]

Can someone please help me? Anyone? Will answer yours.

[GoLions 0]

Can someone please help me? Anyone? Will answer yours.

Yea, take Rice.

[Tippett56 0]

I like AP....agree with everyone else that both will be good, but from my perspective, I will take the guy that has done it consistently for years versus the guy looking to repeat breakout year

[Longus 2]

Peterson. He is safer and not that bad in ppr format.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=387265

[Tippett56 0]

Yea, take Rice.

 

You are right, I like Rice better than both especially in PPR.

[GoLions 0]

You are right, I like Rice better than both especially in PPR.

You would probably like my team too after looking at yours

 

Schaub, Rice,Forte, F. Jones, Marshall, Nicks, Winslow.

[Tippett56 0]

You would probably like my team too after looking at yours

 

Schaub, Rice,Forte, F. Jones, Marshall, Nicks, Winslow.

 

I wanted F. Jones as well because I am thinking he will have a nice season but he got nabbed right before I was gonna grab him.

[Isophix 0]

I agree with the Ray Rice call.

 

Here is why:

 

1. Ray lost the vulture, Willis McGhee. Mr. McGhee is now stealing TDs from Kno-Sho in Denver.

2. Joe Flacco lost Derrick Mason, T.J. Houshmanzadah, and Todd Heap. His main receiving points are now Lee Evans, Boldin, and.... Ray Rice.

3. People forget that running backs need holes to run through. One of the main reasons Foster had a fantastic year is named Vonta Leach. Mr. Leach is now the fullback for Mr. Rice, due to an off-season trade.

4. The Ravens have made significant improvements to the O-line.

5. Mr. Rice is in a contract year.

6. The back end of the Ravens schedule is loaded with teams such as Cleveland (x2), Cincinnati (x2), Arizona, Seattle, San Francisco.

 

 

So, in conclusion: All the stars are aligned, and Mr. Rice wants to get paid.

[HowieWan 0]

Go Adrian Peterson. McNabb lived for years throwing the ball out to Westbrook - we're going to see more of that this year to get ADP into space and spare McNabb some hits as well. I like Rice next, and then Foster. All three are solid, so go with your gut.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=387281

[Broheim Steamrollers 0]

I would go with consistency over Foster trying to repeat a breakout year and possibly dealing with a linger hammy problem. I think either would be a solid pick and would be happy with either.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=387129

[medium bill 2]

I also would go AP and then Rice before Foster.

[greenegt 3]

I drafted Foster #1 this past Saturday, before the hammy flared up again. Foster will be effective once he gets healthy, but if I were drafting tonight, I'd take AP #1.