Matt Mueller 146 Posted November 10, 2011 Hey guys...I play in a 14 team league. I own McFadden but not bush. Here's how my squad breaks down. Qb: Stafford RB: Forte RB: Starks WR: Aj Green TE: Graham W/T: Greg Olsen W/R: Nicks Bench:Tebow, Dwill, E. Bennet, B. Celek. The bush owner is unresponsive in trying to make a deal. I just got an offer of Fitz straight up for McFadden. It would have me starting starks for the remainder of the season but would bump Greg Olsen, who has been good with Cam, in favor of Fitz. It also provides a bit of WR insurance in case Nicks misses time or Green underperforms against the better defense he faces. Bottom-line I'm worried McFadden might miss extended time and if so even an underperforming Fitz would be better but I don't want to pass on the upside that McFadden has and rely on woeful Starks. Would anyone make this deal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jackjohn 31 Posted November 10, 2011 Going from McFadden to Starks will be a bigger drop than what Olsen to Fitzgerald is an upgrade. Fitzgerald has some poor qb'ing in his corner, which brings him way down. So no on this trade. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=395172&pid=4626414&st=0entry4626414 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Mueller 146 Posted November 10, 2011 Going from McFadden to Starks will be a bigger drop than what Olsen to Fitzgerald is an upgrade. Fitzgerald has some poor qb'ing in his corner, which brings him way down. So no on this trade. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=395172&pid=4626414&st=0entry4626414 Yeah I agree if McFadden returns at all it's a bad deal. I'm gonna keep the trade open and if news on McFadden not returning for weeks appears I might consider getting something for nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites