Vick for Wilson? whir

[jackjohn 31]

Ppr 6pt TDs Bonus for 40+ yard catches and runs.

 

Start qb, 2rb, 3 wr, 1 te, no flex

 

My team:

 

QB: Luck

 

RB: Forte, G. Bernard, Wilson, J. Bell, Tate, McGahee, Ellington

 

WR: C. Johnson, D. Jax, Jordy, Cruz, Garcon, Broyles

 

TE: Clay

 

I have to make a 2-1 move as I dropped my kicker for Broyles.

 

The other owner has Romo/Vick, so I asked what he wanted for Vick. He said Wilson/Broyles.

 

With Brown coming back later and the o-line looking like shat, I think this is a no brainer. But these no brainers make me question myself.

 

What say you? And leave a link, I always reply.

[scottsind 61]

Yes you do this trade. Your wide receiver's are so good there is no way you start broyles over any of them.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=424309

[CallMeBigCat 1]

Its a good trade for sure, but you dont really need Vick. I would try to go after a TE like J. Thomas or Cameron. I would offer Cruz and someone to get a TE. But if you really want Vick, you could definitely do that trade. You're barely giving up anything.

[Acaeagle 1]

I agree with the TE upgrade. Vick is a hit away from being out. He played like garbage last week.

[jackjohn 31]

I've tried the te upgrade. The guy with Cameron/Gonzo (who is weak at rb) told me he would rather have points on his bench than in my lineup. My thinking is that when injuries hit, my prices will go way up. BTW he has Foster, I have Tate.