Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JustinCharge

defining WMDs: a continuing 20+ year series

Recommended Posts

Weve seen the democrat be unable to define what a woman is, and they still cant define an WMD, either.  We actually have an update on the crazed liberal definition of what "WMDs" are.

1.  George Bush claimed Iraq had WMDs.  We found weapons that may have been too old to fire, maybe not.  The MSM only heard the "too old to fire" part and immediately denounced Bush daily for lying about WMDs until the democrat base wanted Bush charged with war crimes.  

2.  When those kids set up an improvised bomb out of a crock pot in the Boston Bombing, THAT was defined as a WMD.  So a crock pot is a WMD, the tired munitions we found in Iraq which could fairly easily be restored to working status were not WMDs.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/suspect-boston-marathon-attack-charged-using-weapon-mass-destruction

3. Cluster bombs when provided to Ukraine by a democrat president are NOT WMDs and even though we denounced Russia for using them, its OK for democrats to use them.

 

Most importanatly, nobody is allowed to EVER correct the record on this because the MSM will tar and feather you if you do and ruin your life and career. Be silent.  Accept the lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

2.  When those kids set up an improvised bomb out of a crock pot in the Boston Bombing, THAT was defined as a WMD

They also call the AR-15 an assault weapon. It's a rifle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×