Andrew Martinez 0 Posted November 15, 2009 Simple, Aaron Rodgers or Donovan McNabb? Mind you that in the league, you get -2 points per sack taken. TIA. As always, leave a link. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
madd futher mucker 36 Posted November 15, 2009 No guarantees, but I'd STILL go with Rodgers. I'd rather go with a high end QB1 that holds the ball too long, than a QB2, which is what McNabb has been looking like lately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daltnator 19 Posted November 15, 2009 McNabb-With Damarcus Ware in town youre libel to lose 4-8 points in sacks!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j0ker 3 Posted November 15, 2009 Thats a tough one but my gut says Rodgers. I can see him hitting Jennings or Driver more consistently than the hope and pray that that Mcnabb hits Jackson or Maclin. As for losing points on sacks Mcnabb isn't as mobile as he once was and Rodgers line sucks so it's a toss up there. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=357031 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ackattack 0 Posted November 15, 2009 Well at least Philly hasnt lost to Tampa Bay yet...I would go with McNabb..he seems to come back strong especially when his back is against the wall. San Diego had a nice win over the G men but Philly lit them up and it was ugly. Maybe not a by the numbers pick but i go with McNabb mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=357032 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CajunBadger 10 Posted November 15, 2009 Rodgers - have to believe GB will do some things to help cut down on the sacks. And not to jinx, but Rodgers has only one multi-interception game this year (and total of 3 in his career, albeit short). And question how good Dallas' secondary is - think it's exploitable. SD's pass d could give McNabb some troubles. I say Rodgers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted November 15, 2009 Simple, Aaron Rodgers or Donovan McNabb? Mind you that in the league, you get -2 points per sack taken. TIA. As always, leave a link. Rodgers. I think the sack problem gets a lot less severe today; there was a "coming together" this past week, and I think the Pack starts fixing their problems this week. Rodgers can light it up against anyone, and I think he'll have his share of rush yards this week, as I believe the team has decided that they'd rather take their chances rolling Rodgers out and possibly getting hit while running the ball than they were simply allowing him to be hit in the pocket. Regardless, the odds that Rodgers will put up far better offensive numbers than McNabb will is high. I think Rodgers will be good for 330 yds +2TDs this week, and I see McNabb as 260 +1or2TDs. That's an interesting -2/sack on the QB rule. What about INTs? McNabb is far more likely to throw a pick than is Rodgers... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
