Scatterjack 0 Posted September 16, 2005 Rank Order: 1. Blitzen's Bombers 2. Mountain Madness 3. Freeze 4. Forty Acres 5. Monster God Balls 6. Red October 7. Borg 0403 8. Low Level Owls 9. Fightin Whities 10. Goldilock's Zone 11. Dark Side of the Moon 12. Chaos Theory I'll get the Rank Order out sooner in the future. I see how it can effect the bidding process. Rookie mistake....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scatterjack 0 Posted September 16, 2005 Bids Recieved Blitzen Bid 2 on SD Chargers DEF Bid 1 on Neil Rackers PK ZONA IF NOT THEN Bid 1 on Tynes PK Chiefs Mountain Madness WR Frisman Jackson CLE 3pts WR Wesley Welker MIA 2pts WR Troy Brown NE 1 pt Freeze No bids this week Forty Acres No email Monster God Balls Shaud Williams - 1 Koren Robinson - 4 Brandon Manumaleuna - 1, if not then Jim Kleinsasser- 1 (Editors note: Kleinsasser bid must be ignored) Red October bid 2 Lamar Gordon RB PHI bid 1 Teyo Johnson TE ARZ bid 1 Charlie Adams WR DEN Borg Bid 2 on WR Wesley Welker, MIA Bid 1 on QB Anthony Wright, BAL Bid 1 on PK John Carney, NOS Low Level Owls 2 A.Chatman, WR, GB Fightin Whities Bid 6 for Chris Baker Bid 1 for MIA DT, IF NOT/THEN Bid 1 for SF DT Goldilocks No email Dark Side No email Chaos Theory bid 3 on Chris Baker, TE, NYJ if not then bid 1 on Daniel Wilcox, TE, BAL bid 1 on Jacksonville Jaguars, DT, JAC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scatterjack 0 Posted September 16, 2005 Results: Blitzen 2 Chargers, DT 1 Neil Rackers, K AZ Mountain Madness 3 Frisman Jackson, WR CLE 2 Wesley Welker, WR MIA 1 Troy Brown, WR NE Monster God Balls 1 Shaud Williams, RB BUF 4 Koren Robinson, WR MIN 1 Brandon Manumaleuna, TE STL Red October 2 Lamar Gordon, RB PHI 1 Teyo Johnson, TE AZ 1 Charlie Adams, WR DEN Borg 0403 1 Anthony Wright, QB BLT 1 John Carney, K NO Low Level Owls 2 Antonio Chatman, WT GB Fightin Whities 6 Chris Baker, TE NYJ 1 Dolphins, DT Chaoes Theory 1 Daniel Wilcox, TE BLT 1 Jaguars, DT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scatterjack 0 Posted September 16, 2005 FA Points Left Blitzen's Bombers 14 Mountain Madness 11 Freeze 17 Forty Acres 17 Monster God Balls 11 Red October 13 Borg 0403 15 Low Level Owls 15 Fightin Whities 10 Goldilock's Zone 17 Dark Side of the Moon 17 Chaos Theory 15 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Sez 0 Posted September 16, 2005 by my calculation this is the rank order Chaos Theory Dark Side Goldilocks Zone Fightn' Whities Low Level Borg0403 Red October Monster GB Forty Acres Freeze Mountain Madness Blitzen Bombers we process in Reverse Priority Blitzen Bombers - Blitzen 14 Pts Remain Bid 2 on SD Chargers DEF (AWARDED) Bid 1 on Neil Rackers PK ZONA (AWARDED) IF NOT THEN Bid 1 on Tynes PK Chiefs (IGNORNED) Pale Rider - Mountain Madness 11 Pts Remain WR Frisman Jackson CLE 3pts (AWARDED) WR Wesley Welker MIA 2pts (AWARDED) WR Troy Brown NE 1 pt (AWARDED) Know Doubt - Freeze 17 Pts Remain no bids this week Forty Acres 17 Pts Remain no message this week Farmer Bernie - MGB 11 Pts Remain Shaud Williams - 1 (AWARDED) Koren Robinson - 4 (AWARDED) Brandon Manumaleuna - 1, (AWARDED) INELIGABLE BID IGNORED - You can only list three names (4th Name And Beyone Ignored Even if BManumaleuna was take) if not then Jim Kleinsasser- 1 Orgazmo - Red October 13 Pts Remain bid 2 Lamar Gordon RB PHI (AWARDED) bid 1 Teyo Johnson TE ARZ (AWARDED) bid 1 Charlie Adams WR DEN (AWARDED) Borg0403 15 Pts Remain Bid 2 on WR Wesley Welker, MIA (LOST BID TO MM) Bid 1 on QB Anthony Wright, BAL (AWARDED) Bid 1 on PK John Carney, NOS (AWARDED) hellothere - Low Level Owls 15 Pts Remain 2 A.Chatman, WR, GB (AWARDED) Scatterjack - Fightn' Whities 10 Pts Remain Bid 6 for Chris Baker (AWARDED) Bid 1 for MIA DT, (AWARDED) IF NOT/THEN Bid 1 for SF DT (IGNORED) Goldilocks Zone 17 Pts Remain no message this week Dark Side 17 Pts Remain no message this week whoisjgalt - Choas Theory 15 Pts Remain bid 3 on Chris Baker, TE, NYJ (LOST BID TO SCAT) if not then bid 1 on Daniel Wilcox, TE, BAL (AWARDED) bid 1 on Jacksonville Jaguars, DT, JAC (AWARDED) Note: we only accept the first 3 names listed in the FA process. Otherwise you could string out 25 names in a horrid IF NOT THEN string. (Monty Pythonesque) And the book said their shall be three names and only three. Not Four but maybe two and while one or even none is allowed, their shall not be more than three. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted September 16, 2005 I realize that it won't affect the results, but why am I last? Scatter outscored me and we're both 1-0. (I thought that we took out the division wins since they are grossly unfair to the teams that get stuck playing division games early - since playing them early is just a matter of bad luck.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scatterjack 0 Posted September 16, 2005 I realize that it won't affect the results, but why am I last? Scatter outscored me and we're both 1-0. (I thought that we took out the division wins since they are grossly unfair to the teams that get stuck playing division games early - since playing them early is just a matter of bad luck.) same rules minus Division Wins Total Wins, Total Loses, Points Against, Points For, Coin Toss Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted September 17, 2005 I realize that it won't affect the results, but why am I last? Scatter outscored me and we're both 1-0. (I thought that we took out the division wins since they are grossly unfair to the teams that get stuck playing division games early - since playing them early is just a matter of bad luck.) same rules minus Division Wins Total Wins, Total Loses, Points Against, Points For, Coin Toss So I'm punished because Bernie scored more than your opponent? Suggestion for next off season: 1) Total Wins + (0.5 * Total Ties) where lowest gets first priority 2) Points Scored For where lowest gets first priority 3) Points Scored Against where highest gets first priority 4) Dice Roll using the Irony Mail Roll application where lowest gets first priority Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orgazmo 2 Posted September 17, 2005 So I'm punished because Bernie scored more than your opponent? According to the rules, yes. I can't believe it hasn't been noticed until now, but Dan, was there a reason to have "points against" to be a determining factor before "points for"? And since it doesn't specify, is it higher or lesser points against being the deciding factor? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Sez 0 Posted September 17, 2005 Losing (or winning) against weaker or stronger opponents. Who's Team is number one because not only did he win his game but also against the greatest opposition. Correspondingly Blitzen is the last team because not only did he lose, but lost against the lowest scoring winner. If it is a problem, then lets talk about it in January. It has been this way although maybe masked somewhat by the Division Wins filter. I guess it has a bit of luck involved in it but basically it is an effort to interp some form of "tougher schedule" into the mix of rankings instead of just the straight Wins/Points output of your own team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Sez 0 Posted September 17, 2005 So I'm punished because Bernie scored more than your opponent? According to the rules, yes. So instead of this being the first game of the year, assume it is the last. Would Who be "punished" with the championship of his division with this same rank order? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted September 17, 2005 Dan - I'm suggesting that points scored is a better indication of team strength than points against. If my team scores 250 this week and faces a team that only scores 50, then which figure is a better indication of my team's relative strength? I'd get to have my team's FA needs filled ahead of the guy who won 115-105. Clearly IMO the guy who only got 115 would have more problems that need addressing via FA than my team would. This is a topic for the off-season - we're not going to change this rule now (and in fact we cannot). But I'm just documenting my ideas for that time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan Sez 0 Posted September 17, 2005 Good. I'll pin a thread to keep it up for the season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Farmer Bernie 0 Posted September 17, 2005 against the greatest opposition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orgazmo 2 Posted September 17, 2005 against the greatest opposition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
