Jump to content

Casual Observer

Members
  • Content Count

    2,711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Casual Observer


  1. 2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

    If you're a grown man and throwing around terms like Alpha and Beta, and my favorite, "Low T", you got real issues.

    Trump has ruined you guys.

    This thread is so bad, that I find myself agreeing with this Low-T cretin and MDC on these issues, whom I have called a h0m0 at least 1000 times.


  2. 4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

    See this is problematic. It’s partly true but not entirely true: 

    Abbas, like Arafat before him, has voiced support for a 2 state solution. Yet there have always been 3 conditions and 1 problem  to this support which Israel will not accept: 

    1. The Palestinian Authority (Abbas/Fatah) wants 100% of the settlements on the West Bank occupied by Jews since 1967 removed. But some of these settlements are over 50 years old and you’re talking about the forced removal of thousands of people, some of which have sworn that they will die before they leave. At one point during the Clinton Presidency the Israelis agreed to remove 95% of these settlements but never 100%. The PA has always insisted on 100%. However, most long time negotiators believe that this problem can be settled. 

    2. The Palestinians have always insisted on the Right of Return, meaning that anyone of Palestinian descent of any age can “return” to Israel and become a citizen of Israel. Given that there are many more Palestinians than Jews, this would inevitably result in Israel ceasing to exist, which is why Israel will never agree to it. And it’s this condition that causes people like @jerryskids to correctly point out that most Palestinians want a “one state solution”. However most long time negotiators again believe that this problem can ultimately be settled, perhaps by only allowing Palestinians of a certain age to return, or some kind of monetary settlement for lands lost (reparations if you will.) 

    3. The Palestinians have always insisted on Jerusalem being their capital, for historical and religious reasons. The Israelis will never agree to this for historical and religious reasons. Negotiators have struggled with this issue and been unable to solve it, but the USA has tried to take a neutral stance by having its embassy in Tel Aviv rather than Jerusalem, until Trump changed that in order to make one of his biggest donors happy, the late Sheldon Adelson. Now we continue to pay the cost for that blunder. 

    4. The problem, beyond these conditions, is that Gaza and the West Bank are not contiguous. Israel divides them, so it would be problematic to have a state of Palestine in which the land is separated. The British Raj solved a similar problem in 1948 by creating two separate Muslim territories out of India: Pakistan and Bangladesh. But that would entail a 3 state solution. 

    5. The position of Hamas is pretty simple: Israel will never agree to any of this so Fatah is weak. The only way there will ever be a Palestinian homeland is to destroy Israel. There is a lot of sympathy for Hamas among Palestinians because they appear to be fighters, fighting back, etc. Many leftists won’t speak out against Hamas because leftists are sympathetic to Palestinians in general. But in truth, I believe that very few Palestinians, and almost no leftists, are so fanatic against Israel that they want to see it completely destroyed. That’s where I think Jerrykids and others get it wrong. 

     

    Didn't anybody tell these Jews that diversity is our strength?  Fockin racists, supremacist bastardos.


  3. 7 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

    I have also seen a ton of Muslim hatred from the right in this thread. It’s really despicable. 

    Would you stop wringing your hands then and fock off to some other site?

    • Thanks 1

  4. 7 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

    Link? The only antisemitism I have seen in this thread has come from the right (CDub and Casual Observer.) 

    Telling the truth about Jewish bullshiot is not anti-semitism, Tim.  You and the tribe might be waking up to the fact that banging the drum of anti-semitism 24/7 just annoys people and galvanizes them against Jews.  No complaining about importing Muslims to the West, who are now openly demonstrating against Jews, either.


  5. On 11/4/2023 at 3:12 PM, Voltaire said:

    I don't know how many people here are black because it seldom comes up. I only know of two: Peenie and League Champion. There are surely more but behind the keyboard, who can tell, we're all the same color. Most people just type and don't talk about their race.

    I like peenie, am glad she's here and have always gotten along with her. I admire her willingness to come back despite the abuse she gets, plenty of which is race related and out of line. League Champion doesn't lead with being mulatto, and you wouldn't guess it, but he's open about it when its relevant to the topic at hand. I don't know that he's ever gotten any grief over it. 

    ----

    More generally, we have racists here and when I see threads that look geared towards that, I don't open them, let alone participate. It leaks out into other threads. Personally, I'm far more interested in conservatives making inroads within the black and hispanic communities than placating race deadenders. LC is further right than I am. As for peenie, ah, peenie's daughter and uncle see through the left's BS, as for peenie herself, I've seen twenty years of her taking two steps forward and two steps back. 

     

    You're very quiet about anti-white racism.  A hint of what you'd term anti-semitism and you're compelled to post about it.  This post with your past anti-Christian rants reveal you to be a poser.


  6. 1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

    I'd not read anything about this until you posted it. It's disturbing if true but it also comes across as potentially PLO propaganda. Preliminary results from all the Google search MSM headline results are reading similar to it: slamming the settlers hard but I'll keep digging. This seems wholly out of character, I'll see if I can find the Israeli settler side of the story to see if it makes some sort of sense.

    Voltaire just can't believe it.  He's going to do some real digging this time.

    • Haha 1

  7. On 11/5/2023 at 10:10 PM, jerryskids said:

    For most of Israel's existence, they have been open to and proposed 2 state solutions.  Palestinians have unilaterally declined it.  Now the thought experiment of Israel not being open to such a solution because Hamas has stated, as recently as this week, that their goal is the complete eradication of Israel and, as a bonus, death to all Jews.  This does not strike me as a 2 state solution proposal from Hamas, but nevermind, Israel is the bad guy here.  :thumbsup: 

    Israel's been open to a two state solution while constantly encroaching on Palestinian land with new settlements over the years?  You could have fooled me.


  8. On 11/5/2023 at 7:45 PM, Gepetto said:

    How can there be 2.4 million people in a 25 mile by 10 mile strip of land. Where did these people use to live? Did they have more land? Or do they reproduce like rabbits?

    Both.  But why don't you know the answer to these questions?


  9. 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

    Somebody is lying. 
     

    The Israeli government is claiming that there is a “safe space” in south east Gaza where it has urged Palestinians to go to. “Nobody has to die,” Netanyahu said yesterday, “they can flee to the safe space and they will not be harmed. Hamas is preventing them from fleeing to the safe space so Hamas is responsible for all of the civilian deaths.” 
     

    However the United Nations is claiming that south east Gaza is being bombed at an intense level and there is no “safe space”. They are backed up by most of our mainstream media, particularly MSNBC and CNN which are showing pictures and videos which apparently demonstrate that Israel is lying. 

    Jews lying?  You can't be serious.


  10. 10 hours ago, KSB2424 said:

    I clicked on my notifications tonight.   @Casual Observer in a span of 3 minutes around noon today went and put the sad emoji on 8 of my most recent posts. Instead of just answering a simple question he went back in this thread to put emoticons.  That’s what a teenage girl would do.  Jesus.  :lol: 

    On top of being an Israel-first bootlicker, you're a lying little biotch.  Around noon yesterday I was responding to a number of your stupid posts, including answering your question at least twice. I didn't leave and come back, much less to put sad emojis on your posts, which I also didn't do.  None of us know who puts emojis on our posts, but you falsely claim to know it was me. What a weird, lying loser.

    You still didn't answer my questions, pu55y.  I'd tell you to man up and nut up, but I don't think you have any nuts.


  11. Just now, KSB2424 said:

    I will answer my question to make it crystal clear; because I have balls.

    After the atrocities of last weekend Israel couldn't simply do nothing,  that option means they will be eventually exterminated, and it will happen over and over again.  I believe their response, while a deadly one was warranted.   Unlike Palestine they at least gave a warning.  Hamas uses humans as shields, they are not normal soldiers but savages in that regard.  It's a terrible situation they have put anyone in.  Also, you cannot negotiate with terrorists.

    From the American perspective I do not want any troops on the ground but to only publicly support Israel, help with any intelligence, and provide munitions if needed.

    See that is what nutting up and giving an opinion on a CURRENT event looks like.  Not some circle jerk of long winded non answers.

     

    Look, don't try to tell me what a tough guy you are.  I'm laughing at you, sweater vest.  Your statement doesn't really say anything other than politician-like platitudes.  "You can't negotiate with terrorists."  No shiot.  The only thing you left out is how Israel is our greatest ally.  You backtracked on your desire to bomb the rest of this Pali population and you won't answer the question today.  That makes you a pu55y.  Log off and stop humping my leg.

    • Like 1

  12. 1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

    Kissinger said the other day he was wrong about advocating for importing the third world into Europe. 

    Too late now.  How's he going to fix that situation?


  13. 1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

    You never answered the question.  Just long winded……non answers.  
     

    What do you think Israel should have done after last weekend’s atrocities?  

    I did answer.  I said I don't care, but don't slaughter a bunch of innocents in the process.  Not too hard to glean that from my comments.  You still haven't answered mine.  Hell, you still haven't explained why you're tripping all over yourself for Israel.


  14. On 10/11/2023 at 11:24 PM, KSB2424 said:

    But dude, after doing all that, and even after a 24 hour warning to leave the premises, I’m upset and posting as much online.  But don’t judge me.  

    24 hour warning to leave the premises?  What do you think this is some kind of house party that got too loud?


  15. 6 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

    What do you think Israel should have done after last weekend?  It’s a really simple and direct question.  Why won’t you answer?

    I've answered.  You don't want to accept the answer.  Best thing for you to do is to drop everything, fly to Israel and join the IDF.  By the way, since you started the 20 questions game, why won't you give a straight answer to the simple question I posed to you?


  16. 4 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

    1.  I’ve posted since day one I don’t want American direct involvement. Beyond intelligence, public support and munitions if needed.  

    2.  Graham is talking about Iran not Palestine.

    3.  It’s obvious you don’t read the threads or watch the videos.  

    Listen, don't play stupid with me.  Just the other day you were right on board with Nikki Haley and Lindsey Graham telling Israel to finish them (the Palis).  Graham's latest comment, regarding Iran, doesn't detract from the prior statements that you completely agreed with and that today, you're backtracking.


  17. 1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

    Man up, nut up and answer my question.  This thread was started because of the events of last weekend, that took it to a while other level.  Man up and answer my question.  Nobody wants to read your long winded virtuous diatribe.  JFC

    Man up and nut up?  Pipe down sweater vest before I find you and stuff you into a locker.  The answer is, I don't really care, as long as a bunch of innocents aren't slaughtered.  You care deeply, though, which is why you've been virtue signaling all over this thread.  Make up your mind; either you want all of the Palis bombed or not.


  18. 2 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

    Lindsey Graham is the worst.  He’s a childless old man who has no care what happens.  

    Just the other day you were lockstop with Nikki Haley and Lindsey Graham in bombing all of the Palis to hell, because, you know, Israel gave them 24 hours to leave.  Now you're changing your tune.  Why?


  19. 9 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

    People are reacting to the current events that started last Saturday.  Your solution is to build a Time Machine, and go back in time to make different decisions. Great. But that is not reality of the day, solves nothing, offers nothing and makes you sound like a fence riding, virtuous arsehole.  
     

    So I’ll ask you.  What do YOU think Israel should have done after last weekends atrocities?  

     

    The current events of last Saturday do not have their origins as of last Saturday.  It's obvious to me that many people here haven't considered that or don't care.  Don't put words in my mouth and don't make stupid analogies; I advocate for not making the same stupid decisions over and over again. We just recounted how the US gives Israel billions in direct military aid every year.  Now we need to give more?  Where has all that weaponry and ammo gone to?  That also goes for entanglement in every conflict Israel wants us to have and it also goes for importing Muslims here and other societies they don't belong in don't care to assimilate to.

    Your last question is a question of bias and perspective.  Because you're a knee-jerk, Israel-first neocon, you're first thoughts and actions are to wring your hands for Israel.  I don't really care to think for them or to offer suggestions, but if Israel is going to slaughter a million women and children who are penned in Gaza, they'll have to face the stiff condemnation they rightly deserve for doing so.  I write this as a white guy, who, in his own homeland is being cast as some kind of domestic terrorist, especially where I advocate for some kind of nationalism and restricting our borders.  None of you fockers would stand up for me in that event, but you're falling all over yourselves for a group of foreign people, who really don't give a fock about you either, while advocating for their supposed right of extreme nationalism and dare I say, apartheid racism.

    • Like 1

  20. 2 hours ago, Gepetto said:

    You're just falling right in line with the liberal media saying words to harm Israel's response. You though, do it because you hate Jews. Take your hate to another message bored. You hate Jews because they are far more successful than you could ever dream to be; pure jealousy and it makes you ugly.

    Don't you think the liberal media is full of Jews?


  21. Welp, we've learned a lot from this thread.

    1.  We still have several neocons around.  They stumble about like zombies mumbling "greatest ally" or "ally."  This is incompatible with an America First ideology, which several also claim to believe in.

    2.  You don't like Muslims and all they bring with them?  Stop importing Muslims.  There are probably two other people on this site who ever cared to learn who the driving force behind such a thing.

    3.  Only me and Cdub100 have the special "They Live" sunglasses.

×