The Real timschochet

Of course they do. Socialism is awful and leads to evil outcomes, Communism is even worse. The problem with this approach is that Kamala is neither.

Ah you’re in the @Cdub100 club, right?

Most likely Ukrainians operating independently. But I have no idea. All I know is that Hersh says whatever the Russians tell him to .

This argument will no doubt do as well with voters as the Communist one. Well done!

Also per Frank Luntz: trying to label Kamala a Communist over her plan to stop price gouging is a complete political disaster for Trump. It’s just going to lose him votes: https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/video/donald-trump-communist-claims-kamala-harris-luntz-digvid-lead

Wrong again. Why don’t you start telling us what YOU think and why, and stop misrepresenting what I think?

You’re wrong but I’m not going to waste time arguing with you about tariffs in general. All you need to know is that imposing them on ALL countries without limitation, and 60% on China, will destroy our economy and most likely lead to World War III.

No. He wasn’t, sorry.

She seems to understand the free market, when it comes to trade, far better than her opponent. As for the rest of it damn you guys are silly.

First off if I’m up early it’s for work, not because I’m obsessed with posting here. Had an emergency this morning at one of the shopping centers. Second- Biden’s tariffs, and his refusal to remove Trump’s old tariffs, were terrible decisions and they have really hurt the economy. But all of this is NOTHING compared to what Trump is preparing to do for the next 4 years. He wants 10-20% tariffs on ALL countries, not just a few. He wants 60% tariffs on China, which might as well be a declaration of war. The dude is seriously crazy on this subject. And if elected he has the power to do this- Congress can’t stop him. And no sane person can support this, or support him. So be critical of Kamala’s economic plans all you want, but there is really no rational alternative to voting for her:

But she rejects Trump’s tariff proposals and that alone makes her the better choice, hands down.

This might not last. I am reading a TON of outrage about this. Maybe the military are finally fed up with his sh!t, as well they should be. There has never been a President, or even prominent person in this country, as disrespectful to the military as Trump has been. Not even Jane Fonda.

No I understand it great. You didn’t contradict what I wrote. It allows people who already own the house to keep their taxes low. That allows for further investment. (What is basically allowed for was for older parents to give money to their adult kids to be able to afford down payments on new housing. And it allowed people looking to upgrade to better housing the money to do so.)

Don’t be too obvious

My conversation is with @jerryskids and it’s clearly above you. Go back to the kids table.

No but Soros pays me well. (Actually that’s a lie but I posted it because I know @Cdub100 believes it.)

And @jerryskids I wasn’t trying to give a master class. I was pointing out that while neither political party really cares about our debt, Republicans only pretend to care when it’s spending they don’t like. I’m sure you don’t disagree. As for Kamala, she doesn’t even pretend to care. I admit I liked her speech today, mainly because I want her to win and I think this will help her do so. But she is a spend spend spend liberal just like every other liberal before her. Who could deny it? She doesn’t worry about the deficit or the debt. Why should she? She threw in a laughable line today, something like “we will reduce the deficit as we do this!” No explanation how. It was similar to when Trump claimed that cutting corporate taxes actually produces more revenue. Ah well.

Abbot can’t fill the buses: not enough migrants: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna166412 Looks like this is less of an issue. Should help Kamala.

Whatever it is it will be less than Trump.

Exactly. And you’re not giving 25,000 to homeowners. You’re giving banks a credit. I seriously doubt any money is printed. Which is part of the reason I question whether this will cause net inflation either.

Nope. And it’s not going to hurt her either.

Honestly this claim that Kamala Harris isn’t generating huge crowds is just making you look really really really stupid. Everyone is laughing at you.

Policy only! So much for the character attacks and memes! Well done

both are good ideas and what you fail to recognize is that if we don’t do this you will end up paying far more.

Sure he approves that message, because he’s the one mostly to blame for the inflation, and he will make it far worse. Good luck with that ad, lol.