Sean Mooney

So you've nothing to add to the conversation or thread I see?

So now we want to battle over nomenclature? It's the term for it. God you are dense.

Length wise or width wise?

He threw it all together though into one super scenario.

Sure

If anyone argues child rape means parents shouldn't be involved they are dumb. Rare diseases do not dictate abortions for all. That's a dumb argument.

And you're a centrist who defends everything MAGA believes in. Now that we've reached common ground, any other stupid things you want to throw out there so you can try to get some notice from TimPool on a fantasy football message board? Are you asking for a little beanie for Christmas to look like him?

No- I didn't get the connection because I was discussing the LPGA thing and didn't fully see what you were going for because you decided to try and make it about something else. I get it- when you have nothing to add play whataboutism. You do that a lot

Who has made that argument? You threw like 4 conditions into one thing to create an argument.

The key word I included was "seems." Regardless of whether I agree or disagree as to where trannies are allowed is not the point. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree is not the point. If an organization just outright puts a position against something they are going to get pushback. If the LPGA just said "NO transgender women" they are opening themselves up to any number of legal battles. By phrasing their statement the way they did they are closing some of those avenues for lawsuits. Not all, but some. The policy is not going to fly to say no transgender women, nor would it fly to say yes allow them all in. They did what they could to cover all sides of the debate.

Without looking specifically at the arguments laid out by the lawyers I know that gender affirming care as a term is a wide umbrella that refers to a number of things. This is the forum where it always gets boiled down to "sex changes." On your last paragraph- I am not someone who believes in legislating to the exceptions....but I realize I might be alone in my thoughts on that in any number of cases

I have chosen leftist media? That is news to me.

When have I ever said that? I would never just paint a wide brush to say everyone at one place is a "bastion of journalistic integrity"

The BLM riots? That's what you were referring to? A movement that was roughly based around "defund the police" for some people that I did not agree with? It isn't that I don't remember it. I didn't understand the connection you were making. Settle down junior!!

I have zero idea what you are talking about

Who did I hail? I'm glad though you got to stump for your Russian loving boy again.

You are a strange person.

Nope- I've stayed on my course- I think this policy is a good compromise to cover all bases. I'm not for minors to get sex change operations. You all can argue into whatever realm you want to with that

You seem to be drifting towards "I want people to be the way I want them to be." That is not going to get us anywhere

The percentage is small. I disagree that it affects a large portion of the population. Also, they aren't necessarily mentally ill. But even if they are- gender affirming care is about mental help as well. We should allow that. But either way- Let's get back to the main point of the thread though- This is a good policy and covers a lot of bases. Good on the LPGA for this

Let's get back to the main point of the thread though- This is a good policy and covers a lot of bases. Good on the LPGA for this

- Of course no court hears every case. They are still just doing their job of hearing cases. Transgender is a big picture thing right now because of the amount of oxygen it is given. So they are hearing it and will vote it down. The system works. - Are you on the left? Because you said this: "I'm fascinated that you think it's a nothingburger that SCOTUS is considering making it a constitutional right for minors to get irreversible sex change operations. "......you only singled out one aspect of gender affirming care- notably it is the one aspect that is the most controversial. But I'm glad to see that you are agreeing that the people who want to make it solely about sex changes- both right and left- are dopes.

Good addition to the discussion at hand. Hope you didn't hurt any brain cells.

I just want more rock and jock rules in my sports. There should be a golden football that you can put into play that scores you like 12 points on a touchdown

Imagine this guy is a military man, he bitches incessantly about being a real man, and how wimpy people in the political realm are.....and then he has to have his mommy go on TV to vouch for him