Sean Mooney

1.) Never said the tax cut didn't apply to anyone- just that it proportionally favored very wealthy people. 2.) It's a fact what I said in #1. It isn't about denigrating anything. 3.) No, no, no, not really no, maybe....I do think you misses "Libtard" or "your party" or whatever other insult you people like to throw.

FWIW-

I'm sorry that facts bother you. Again- I agreed there was a cut of some kind. I am correctly pointing out who it benefitted the most.

Justin Charge.....dude was an unhinged weirdo

Because you are not seeing the forest for the trees in it all. Again- that is why the "disproportionate" tag is important in the debate. It's not reading it wrong and it's not TDS. I would also agree someone is wrong if they think their taxes weren't cut- even though there are factors in it all By your chart the 10% threshold was raised 21.78%. The 25% bracket (now 22%) was raised 21.83%. The 39.6% bracket (now 37%) was raised 42.80%.

There is a difference between "only for the rich" and "disproportionately benefit the rich"

Yes. MAGA is easily taken in by catchphrases and the personality of Trump. He does just enough to keep them worshipping him while being a net negative overall. But they don't care because he "owns the libs"

Even a wide scale deportation like Trump is promising would cost well into the billions of dollars. I've seen as low as 88 billion and as high as 315 billion depending on the scope of everything. There is also this about deportation: Look I understand the illegal immigration issues that are posed here but I think it is too simplistic to just say we are sending them all back and not understand it will adversely affect the economy in a bunch of ways. Deporting illegal immigrants needs to be targeted and financially sound in order to happen.

Also, the Texans are down to their 3rd and 4th string receivers to start.

Illegal immigration is a problem and I'm 100% sure a rich white guy who has benefitted from utilizing illegal immigration his entire business life is going to be the man to turn that counter all the way back to zero.

Interesting thoughts from Isaac Schorr:

Interrupting the slap fight: The last time PA, WI, MI did not all vote together was 1988. That year PA and MI voted for Bush and WI voted for Dukakis. That election was also the last time a sitting Vice President was elected President.

He created 6 names on a fantasy football message board. Keep it up and he'll make a 7th.....maybe an 8th too

On the first one just an overall feeling based off what I'm seeing in the state. On the second one- PA does not start counting ballots until the day of which essentially means they are running two polling stations at once and if the final total is within like .5% they automatically recount. There will almost assuredly be a recount requested by one side unless the numbers are so out of reach- but considering the last two differences have been 44K and 71K- I can't see that being an issue

We could just make Election Day a national holiday and give everyone the day off which would give people more time to vote that day.

jbycho is just another iteration of utilit99....he is a dolt and a waste of your time.

It's also unknown from the table how many of those people are new voters versus the same old voters. For example, in 2020 there were ~3.4 million votes cast for Trump in PA. At this point 352,000 votes cast. In 2024 we are at 447,000 but are those all new voters or are some of them people who would've cast their vote normally at the polls but decided this year to do it ahead of time? That's harder to measure out.

Trump will win PA. 99% sure it won't be called on Election Night

That's probably where his insecurity comes from...self hating gay guy

I love that he spent days mocking me for putting the wrong name of a podcast as some kind of gotcha and then wrote "loose" instead of "lose" and wrote "blue" instead of "red" and then just tries to hide without being called on it or just mock people for calling him on it What an insecure twat he is. The airstream must be cutting off his oxygen supply

I think with Trump on a lot of this stuff that he either doesn't understand why the fence is there or, more insidiously, doesn't care why the fence was created in the first place.

Would he support a "coup" of the overall country? Of course not. I think at some point- again in a hypothetical scenario where a coup was the plan- I think RFK's familial history would pull him away from that. But in trying to overtake and overhaul the FDA (which I do think is likely and more problematic) he would essentially ripping at a pillar of the US as an attack dog for Trump either knowingly or unknowingly. And again let me be clear to what I've said numerous times. I don't think Trump is the fundamental end of democracy. I do think his plan would kick at some of the foundational pillars of the country which could adversely affect democracy. Even if I don't believe that is his ultimate goal.

If Trump wanted to create a coup of some kind (which I don't think he does) you would still need people on your side. If someone said you could be given a political position and be basically unchecked- which Trump has basically said- you can understand why people would be drawn to that. They may not need Trump but to be the head of the stuff RFK wants to be- Trump is the gateway to that potentially.

What percentage of people do you think: 1.) defend abortion 2.) support surgery/chemicals for children to change their gender 3.) want to shoot everyone who doesn't agree with 1 and 2

His current girlfriend is the pumpkin they gave him to carve at the nursing home. You have no idea how hot that pumpkin might be