Fireballer

What changed? What additional legal hurdles were put into place? Also, I was wrong, your Newsweek article didn’t say “stripping constitutional rights”. It says “stripping constitutional protections”. Its literally in the 2nd paragraph. I stand by my assertion, or we splitting hairs over rights/protections?

Georgia had a 22 week abortion ban previously. The definition of abortion is clear now and it was clear then. Nothing changed but the time paremeters. The definition is clearly written in statute. There was no live pregnancy to abort. The only thing murky is the articles you linked. Anyone that uses the term “stripped constitutional rights” when referring to Roe overturn is an activist, not a journalist. HTH

Could the research experts provide some context please?

This wasnt an abortion. If you’re a practicing OB doc near Atlanta, and don’t know what the definition of abortion is in your state, you’re an idiot. This definition existed way before Roe was overturned. Its malpractice plain and simple. Did you also notice in your research the the only verbiage used from the medical board’s investigation was “preventable”? I wonder why?

Scorpions’ Klaus Meine Dude was like 5’5” and was trying to get away with that bald on top/mullet hair do. Prob not a chick magnet

Anyone want to fact check this utter bullshat?

Add it to the stack of lies…

Unfortunately, these types have been allowed to pollute academia. A generation of malleable minds being fed garbage, produces garbage..

This is like the purple cloud telling on who pee peed in the swimming pool

Are you listening to local, syndicated, XM, etc? I enjoy some good talk radio from both sides, but it’s hard to find good stuff on actual broadcast radio. Recccomendations?

They wouldn’t give up the name of the stupid IT guy that deactivated their accounts. But I found out, and apparently he’s important on some low rent message board

She played her a$$ off today.

If this wasn’t Trump, the first attempt would still be the biggest story of the election, and a 2nd attempt within months would be considered one of the most serious events in presidential history

It’s literally the reason they have TPS. It’s a shathole

What an ignorant attempt at a retort and more evidence of your lack of awareness.

You really should go do a ride along with your local police and try to obtain a police procedural statute manual for your state. Your lack of comprehension of the abilities and discretions of law enforcement is sad considering you’re a grown adult. Everything you’re arguing against is literally in the scope of what cops legally do every day. I’m serious, reach out and go ride with them and ask questions. It will be an enlightening experience. Good luck.

Gotcha

Have you tried what I posted if your on Apple device? I try to edit in browser and it doesn’t work. It only works for me if so paste/edit in Notes app

Exactly, it’s not like Donna Brazile had access to the questions.

So he said he was gonna deport the animal eaters? I missed that

Or, he never mentioned Haitians but your Twitter guy decided to add it? Also, TPS is temporary and individual. So no, to refer to the collective Haitians in Springfield as “here legally” is wrong. Also, if you’re on Apple, you can copy and paste the Twitter link into Notes app. Then edit address from x.com to Twitter.com, copy and paste that into FFtoday and it allows you to embed.

How do you send people from Haiti “back to Venezuela”? Also, how many migrants in Springfield have legal status?

Why was Kamala scared to do a live interview with Musk on X?

Yep “standing”, that’s all. Cop: get in your car and leave (told multiple times) Campbell: Stands there arguing and then hurries past his drivers door towards trunk just before being cuffed. This on top of initially approaching within 10-12 ft? of the officers detaining TH, not immediately following orders to back up, and then approaching again a few mins later. All of this in the video you posted yourself.