jerryskids

Vance is 100% correct on both counts. Your DEFCON 1 level TDS won't let you see it, tho.

It's Halloween somewhere.

Half of the country want this person in charge of foreign policy during this period of high global unrest.

"implore", if you want to correct it. I didn't see anything Meph did that remotely warranted suspension.

Second link in the Google search is a law in Minnesota restricting speech in corporations. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/tim-walz-minnesota-free-speech-employers-labor-unions-religion-politics-2d709299 Most of the rest are about Walz saying there is "no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech." Scary stuff. I would think a former journalist would see why. I suppose you are going to say that this isn't listed on the Harris website so it isn't a "policy." Take your win, you've earned it.

Apparently you didn't look at my link. Shocking.

I didn't delete anything. Also "wants to" is different than "can," so congrats on continuing Meph's dumb strawman. Care to answer my true/false question? Comment on my links? Didn't think so.

McCaffrey It's a league of mostly old friends I've been in since the 90s.

In my main league, I have Goff on bye, so I had to start... ... Kirk Cousins Also have Drake London. Off to a good start, finally.

You are as dumb as Meph. I never said Walz was going to "do away" with the first amendment; that was Meph's strawman that you think was a good job debating. I said he was a threat to it, meaning whittling away at our freedoms. True or false: Tim Walz has proposed policies that would restrict free speech? Hint: Here is the link I provided Meph that he probably ignored. I expect you to as well, and respond with some Eeyore blather. https://www.google.com/search?q=tim+walz+on+speech+restrictions&oq=tim+w&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgAEEUYJxg7MggIABBFGCcYOzIKCAEQLhixAxiABDIGCAIQRRg8MgYIAxBFGDwyBggEEEUYQTIGCAUQRRhBMgYIBhBFGEEyBggHEEUYPNIBCDIwNDZqMGo5qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

No worries, ASU won anyway. The Big12 officials will probably have a "gotta minute" meeting to see how they could have twisted more calls in the favor of legacy teams.

Actually, he didn't. I posted links, he said words ending with insults. I can see that you think that's a big win, but I don't expect you to have a high bar.

I know I'm biased, but the refs couldn't be doing more to help Kansas beat ASU. I defy @cmh6476 to come in and argue otherwise.

Not a good look for me, Rusty?

Respond to my post, tard

Hey Rusty! I appreciate your play on @McBokonon. I actually met him live, when he came back to AZ, along with Autumn Wind. Hopefully you don't blame me for Meph getting banned. I've never reported anyone, and certainly wouldn't do it for the first time for someone who simply posted opinion posts ending in moron or idiot. Stupidity is not a reason to get banned.

Hey, I won one of the first two @Bill E.megaladon teef ever given out here, when the Saints beat the Colts in the SB.

Do you mean in Revelation? The same book which describes the Saints which you claim don't exist?

If you don't support Vance from a Christian perspective, you are even more of a blithering idiot than I had previously thought. Just admit that you'll never support any candidate, and instead you root for God to destroy the earth. Have a great weekend!

Deserve's got nothing to do with it, you POS

Actually, I said this: and this: I realize that showing links to defend positions is anathema to you. Also, reading your vapid, insulting responses is getting kinda tiring TBH.

So let it be written, so let it be done, you POS

Are you entertained, you POS?!

Say hello to my little friend, you POS

Never go full retard, you POS