jerryskids

Go to sleep, Rusty

Interesting that you suck with the opposite sex.

Hey Rusty, what name did you have in your phone for OldMaid?

Perhaps I misspoke. They aren't gospel, but if they get things wrong, it's always an honest mistake, vs intentional disinformation to further a narrative. You've stated this in the past, so please don't post to the contrary.

Don't forget that Tim also considers the MSM to be gospel, and that he considers any statement to the contrary to be a threat to our democracy.

Given his uber successful investment/insurance career, and having offensive names for women who text him, he should probably splurge for the Spotify family plan.

You suck at evangelizing. You use the above excuse to call people you don't like pedoes -- is that what Jesus would do? Accuse them of watching child porn? Saying shame on you? You've convinced zero people here, and I'd be utterly amazed if anyone you've met in real life has converted because of your caustic, negative message. At this point I'm convinced you are borderline retarded, like seriously low IQ. So I don't know why I'm wasting my time with you. Amen Thanks

Really cool that we have Pedro Martinez posting here.

I don't think Frank M is coming back; I had a PM exchange with him when he left the most recent time. I also don't think he'd be a silverback that Rusty would crow about; that strikes me as a Sanctuary person. It would be great to have Mung back, but as a career military person that I don't recall being particularly political, again I don't see why Rusty would care. Rusty has too many tells and little self control to sustain a secret alias IMO. Honestly, he doesn't seem interested in it. Gutter is better, with alia like Psychic Observer.

It occurred to me after posting that that I didn't clarify it very well, since "someone who thinks he is saying something very insightful or clever, when he isn't" also applies to Rusty. But I do feel that the styles are different, and his response to me tacitly confirms he's the guy IMO.

Martinez? Great pitcher.

Eh, style is too different. Rabbit's posts strike me as someone who thinks he is saying something very insightful or clever, when he isn't. That fits the persona of the silverback Rusty so eagerly told us about.

I asked @Rabbit Rangeif he was the guy; from his answer I think that's a yes. Like I said in my post to him, he's not living up to the hype.

I was at the gym. Tough workout: 4 x 8-minute AMRAPs, and I teamed up with some in-shape guys, so I felt compelled to push myself extra hard. To your question, this sounds like a typical TimHauck nit-fest where you yip yip dog on some detail. So I'll pass on getting involved.

Good posts. Yes, we were required to take 8 humanities classes, or basically 1 per semester. I was fortunate that I got credit for two or three of them for college classes I took in HS. I focused on music, since I did music performance in HS (trumpet). Basic piano, composition, one other. I also placed out of English. Before freshman year you could take a test to place out of English. Basically, write an essay on a topic. Intro paragraph, three body paragraphs, conclusion paragraph, walla! In recent years the Humanities, Arts, and Social Science department at MIT has become a shiot show, but I'll skip those details for now.

What have they gotten to know about her?

Fair enough. I have certainly stated the bolded multiple times here. It's so simps like @Pimpadeaux can call him a convicted felon%$#@! Anyway, it seems like there should be mechanisms to compel judges to recuse themselves before going through all of this. But perhaps you are correct and it just needs to run its course.

Now post video of Kamala fielding questions.

It boggles my mind that in the United States of America, Merchan can continue to remain on this case. I guess we're using the Brazil judiciary playbook.

I think it's possible for multiple things to be true at once. 1. She is of questionable competence, has no charisma, and when off-script, spews word salad that sounds like a 5th grader giving a book report on a book she didn't read. 2. She has socialistic tendencies, based on her entire history to date. To think otherwise is fantasy. 3. Independent of the above, it is a smart strategy to keep her as an unknown, so that as you point out, she can seem like whatever voters want her to be. Given the above, it's even smarter. 4. As @jonmx pointed out, she has a complicit lap-dog MSM smoothing the way for her.

I'd like my joy sprinkled with some actual policy details.

Well, 50 years would include Carter and Reagan. Clinton was pretty centrist and worked well with Newt. Economy seemed pretty great under Trump until Covid. I'd need to see how you define "better" and "faster," and how it correlates to higher taxes. Also, what taxes: corporate, income, sales?

It's wrong because it was posted on X? You could prove him wrong by posting your link showing that man-made global warming has been indisputably proven. Waiting for you to make some Eeyore comment to throw the gun yet again.

Sorry but her strategy is to have no actual policies. Happy happy joy joy!

Sorry, but "price control fear mongering" should be the default IMO. Nothing you said remotely convinces me to object to the above statement.