jerryskids

You should read your own links:

Yeah... I think that is unfortunate, because I think there is actually value in separating MAPs who haven't assaulted kids, from pedos who have. I would like MAPs to get therapy or whatever they need to not assault kids. IMO they are two different things, but unfortunately you are probably correct, and obfuscating the two will eventually lead to normalizing pedos.

I don't know if she is still around, but Rashida Jones is/was a turrble actress. I first saw her in The Office and thought she sucked; thankfully they got rid of her. Wait, not really, she got a bigger gig at Parks and Rec, where... she still sucked. Speaking of Parks and Rec, Aubrey Plaza also sucked.

From Slate, 2015, right after Obergefell: Full article: https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/06/same-sex-marriage-and-progressive-politics-can-they-coexist.html

Well, technically, it was. Pretty much all progressive movements are slippery slopes -- their goal is to enable the way for the next, more-progressive movement. We wouldn't be discussing medically transing kids if gays hadn't gotten all those rights including marriage back then. I'm not saying it was wrong to do, but it was a slippery slope. If the Left manages to normalize it, they'll move on to something worse, like maybe pedos? You laugh, but 20 years ago, everyone would have laughed at transing the kids.

I dispute the "culture of sexual assault and dominion over women." I've already pointed out the strong women he's appointed (chief of staff, AG) and his strong daughters. If we are going your route, Harris represents that women can sleep their way to the top. Also, she married a guy who shtupped the nanny and slapped around a girlfriend in Europe, so it seems that if you voted for Harris, you endorse women who like the very "toxic" males you mentioned, and use sex to get what they want.

Pretty good list. I need to learn more about the crypto one.

As you said, nobody knew his background. He could have been a model citizen having a bad day. Or he could have been a homicidal maniac who was about to pull a gun out and start shooting people. This is why we have the concept of legal assault: You do not need to wait to get punched in the face to hit someone. If they are threatening immediate harm, you can defend yourself. This may be why the jury found him not guilty on the lesser charges.

Perfectly. It's exactly like I said. You are merely wording it differently. And you maintain this faulty logic that if you voted for Trump, you are probably MAGA, and by MAGA you mean a cult follower of Trump. You've repeatedly said that if we/I voted for Trump, you voted for and support all of his positions and alleged behaviors. Yet you say that you get to pick and choose. From yesterday: I'd go on but I feel like we're back to the "this one goes to 11" scene from Spinal Tap, so I'll stop now. HTH

I'm Tyreek Hill IRL.

Sorry, I meant Harris, To summarize your post: that's not the logic, but it is the logic with MAGA because it is a cult, and if you voted for Trump, you follow most of his stuff and are in the cult.. Leftism isn't a cult, even if you live in an echo chamber and voted for the most progressive member of the Senate whose only actual identified policies were ultra-left. How'd I do?

LOL, what dumb logic. Also, you voted for Biden, so you support transing the kids. Whee! There are plenty of gays in the MAGA movement; podcaster Dave Rubin is a front and center one. Some might also say Bari Weiss, although she is traditionally center/left, but she's right of Mao so radical Lefties like Gutter consider her MAGA.

I already responded to the topic before this one. Also, doesn't she have a job? Wasn't she elected to help run the US, especially since she should have 25th'd Biden years ago?

If only we could look forward to 4 years of the clarity that is a Kamala Harris response. At the risk of sidetracking, I wonder what she is doing these days. I bet her computer solitaire game is killer.

We had this discussion recently; IMO you are both correct. Whoever runs for the Reps will be labeled as worse than Trump. More specifically, worse than Trump because of the same bad policies but they are more effective speakers/leaders, so they can get more of their dangerous fascist blah blah blah done! We already saw this with DeSantis when he seemed to be the front runner a few years back.

I did? I voted for a guy who appointed conservative justices who decided abortion was a state issue. In Arizona, because of the amendment to the state constitution, women have more freedom to kill their unborn child than ever before. Isn't that great, Gutter?! More dead babies, whee! How are things in Jersey, are abortions outlawed yet? That same man has appointed women as chief of staff (first ever) and AG. He also has strong, capable daughers and daughters in-law. Trump likes confident, capable people, doesn't matter if they are male or female.

Cowboys

Politics aren't already injected into this proceeding?

Center-right conservative guy would be happy that his young son was convinced by woke teachers that he is a girl? Seems normal.

Some witnesses didn't feel threatened, so he wasn't a threat? Brilliant, Clarence Darrow! Also, you clearly have no women or other people in your life who could use protecting in such a situation. My daughter rides the subway in NYC every day and I thank God for men like Daniel Penny who haven't become beta cucks. You should do the same, because you aren't protecting any of your loved ones with your attitude. Also also, I like how you ignore my posts, allegedly because I called you an idiot once, yet you respond to jbycho (seafoam) who insults you with every post. The real reason you ignore me is that you have no substantive response to me, ever. George Orwell: “People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.” Have a nice night.

Thanks, but not seeing it. There are no scandals within the Trump family that I know of. Whereas the Biden family is a shiot show. But the MSM never talks about how well-adjusted the Trump kids and their spouses are. Let me know if you agree or disagree.

Can you elaborate on this? I haven't been following this thread too closely, are there (respected) posters here saying it was a racist thing?

I don't know what he claimed. He claims a lot of stuff. He might try, which would probably accelerate it to SCOTUS. I honestly think this is an important topic which needs to be addressed. And it's clearly a federal issue, so they won't just kick it back to the states.

SCOTUS seems to be staying consistent with their position on abortion, saying this is too contentious an issue to make a federal precedent for, much like I expect they'll do in supporting Tennessee's ban. If you don't like this law in Wisconsin, and you shouldn't, you are free to move to a state which recognizes the importance of parental involvement in gender-denying issues.

I did some research on this, interesting stuff. Regarding a constitutional amendment... possibly, but maybe not. It might come down to interpretation of the language of the 14th amendment, and this court may see fit to interpret it differently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark