jerryskids

@Horseman, your first two implied probability paragraphs don't make sense. The second shouldn't be higher than the first IMO, unless I'm missing something.

Truth on the bolded. I didn't highlight the last line because the Lefties here will argue "no, it's rare!"

I also worry about the general enthusiasm from folks like Musk about the Repubs early voting strength. I feel like it only serves to get lazy Gen Z'ers to get off their ass and vote for Kamala, when they would rather spend election day in their parents' spare bedroom wishing the world placed more value on their French Lit degree.

It would be funny, and somehow typical, if Trump loses this because he brought in a roaster for the MSG rally, that roaster did roaster things, and Trump couldn't simply say afterwards "yeah, we didn't expect that, it went too far. I love Puerto Ricans, they are great people, the best people!" or something similarly Trumpian. I worry about this because, anecdotally, I'm confident that there are a lot of Puerto Ricans in my little NE PA hometown these days.

https://whatismyipaddress.com/how-someone-can-find-your-ip-address-and-what-they-can-do-with-it#:~:text=Your local IP (Internet Protocol,your IP address remains public.

It seems that half his posts are pro-Republican, and the other half are how the government and corporations can spy on you through your phone. This latter group can be seen to lend credibility to his data, but it also seems a little odd that he is doing the spying that he so warns about.

Honest answer: I don't know him personally. I know that he has had multiple similar analyses posted here recently. I just checked out his X account and he has a lot of posts that seem to lend credibility to him being involved with such things. And it seems a weird thing to provide such exact-sounding data on. He also clearly is a MAGA deplorable NAZI scumbag, though. So, the Left can just claim he is biased. I don't know where he gets the data. It doesn't seem like something that would be publicly available. I would presume that somebody in the government is investigating this, if it's potentially illegal.

Lefties here hate data tho. Big crowd! of paid Antifa losers

Hasan is a terrorist supporter, good for Girdusky. And yet another example of how CNN is a Leftist hack organization.

My guess is that he's honestly new. I asked what he does: he works in the operations/back office of a boutique finance company in the bay area. Seems like a nice guy, so I'll treat him as such unless I learn otherwise.

On a scale of 9 to 10, how retarded are you? He's trying to spread the word about a tragic death of an infant, and you are so caught up in finding "gotcha" bible quotes that you are missing the lead. Jesus is going to biotch-slap you down to hell come Judgment Day.

Gutter is Psychic Observer, so I don't think so. Rusty seems like a good guess.

You presume to know a lot about me, new poster person! Also, since you presume that I am a middle-aged white man, what is your age/ethnicity?

Really? So the objection is that a white, non-hispanic (presumably) guy did the PR jokes? Not the jokes themselves?

Is that the orthodox Jewish symbol for, "in this house we shtup the nanny"?

What about the Mexicans, are they PO'd at this?

You might be right, but I think weepaws is a real person. IMO, Rusty would be too busy between his insurance gig and caring for 30+ cats to put in the effort to post so many mind-numbingly stupid posts as weepaws. I mean, if anyone could do it, it would be Rusty. But I'd like to think (hope) that he isn't quite this pathetic. Amen, thanks.

I agreed until I saw her walk across the field during the Rio olympics. If that didn't make it move, you are ghey or dead, just saying.

NP! Maybe you should take a walk?

Helped out with your grammatical issues. YWIA.

Woman is sexually abused, then decides she is a guy, so she transitions. Also he/she hates men, so she became what she hates. @squistionwill tell me that she was always a guy, and that the sexual abuse had nothing to do with her transition.

You guys should read his post again...

What's wrong with that comment? If you claim to be concerned with politicians benefitting from their service, shouldn't you look at the people who are increasing their net worth by several orders of magnitude?