jerryskids

He's killing my team in the Geek Balls league. Jeebus, he can't crack 10 pts PPR? Is there even another WR playing for SF?

This site shows an excellent graph of which states "lose" votes and which "gain" based on representation in Congress vs. population: https://usafacts.org/visualizations/electoral-college-states-representation/ Because every state gets 2 for Senators, the smallest states all get 3 EC votes vs. just 1. But Cali still gets 55 (albeit instead of 65). So yes, your vote counts "less," but not too much less. Also, looking at that chart, it seems to me fairly distributed between Red and Blue as to which states lose votes vs. which gain. If you read that otherwise, let me know. Finally, I'm not sure why you would pick AZ as your example. You'll note from the graph that AZ is on the losing (larger) side as well. Plus it is one of the fastest growing states, in large part because people from your shiot hole keep moving here in droves, bringing the same liberal policies that are destroying Cali. Thanks for nothing.

California and South Dakota have the same number of EC votes?

Well, that's sorta a Kamala word salad. Are you voting for her? My spiritual journey is personal, and is not ultimately one of choice, but of revelation. The election is one of choice, and happening in less than 50 days. Who is your choice, if you are a man?

Weepaws spamming this thread. Who are you voting for? Be a man, make a tough choice.

You obviously did a google search and just posted links you didn't read, boyo. None of them are polls. One of them is a collection of opinions. I never said Trump aced it, or even did well. Back in the thread about the debate, I was clear that I didn't think he did well. I explained why Trump said nice things about the last debate, and why his team is more concerned about debating a live person with CNN. You did not respond to that.

Then why did you ask for three things? Those were all solid answers. I'll give you a 4th you won't believe: improved world peace. The answer to my question is that you have severe TDS.

My point, boyo, is that Trump felt good after that first debate because there was no way he could have felt otherwise. He and his team know it will be different on CNN with a live opponent. Every independent did not say he was awful, that's your feelz. If I had said that, you would keep quoting it for weeks.

He faced a dead guy in the CNN one. And Vox told you he got humiliated. Independents seem less impressed with her word salads.

No, he was throwing out a red herring about Trump's infidelity in a discussion about Kamala being a tyrannical boss.

Kamala banged her way into her career. Her husband shtupped the nanny while married to his first wife.

He turned down a CNN debate? What, was HuffPo not available? Kamala doesn't have the guts to face Trump on a neutral field. She is tough though -- she'll shoot intruders, and world tyrants fear her.

I'm just funnin' with Tim who thinks Word Salad Harris answered 2/3 of the questions.

So why can't she answer it? I mean, she already had the question prior to the debate, and has been asked it again since.

I should have specified the economy, if that's your point. She can't answer it.

Can't you just feel the joy, boyo?

Red herring wut? Does Kamala think people are better off now than they were 4 years ago?

Too bad you missed the last debate.

but but... Kamala is going to tax the rich, and they'll just pay it! Because that has been attempted by every liberal administration in world history and has a 0 for 8216234692 success rate, but by golly, it will work this time! I've said here multiple times in the past that the rich have smarter and more incentivized finance people than the IRS, and always find ways around new taxes. The onus of paying for all the leftist boondoggles fall on the middle class.

Harris' ad for white dudes. Not just dudes, white dudes. OMG, this may be the worst ad I've ever seen. Do they honestly think this is going to bring real men over to their side? Technically, it's from a Harris/Walz aligned PAC, so I guess she has that out.

One idea: I'm watching Three Body Problem, and they just started work on a spaceship propelled by successive nuclear explosions and a nuclear sail to accelerate it to 1% of the speed of light, to reach an alien race approaching earth. Seems plausible. We can put them all on that spaceship.

Obviously, since it isn't practical to capture them all, the right thing to do is to not try to capture any of them. Duh.

That's a really good question. You would think these guys go through some shiot hole airports which have tougher security than we do, as well.

Also, do you know what else encouraged the 1/6 mob? Three months in 2020 when angry BLM protesters rioted, looted, destroyed property including federal buildings and police stations, and took over large parts of major cities, and nobody did a damn thing to stop them. I would say they got a good lesson in what to do when you are unhappy. But muh Capitol is totally different!

You don't think the country will be better prepared to handle an angry mob that got out of hand, this time around?