TimHauck

This report says “the vaccines undoubtedly saved millions of lives,” do you agree?

“Conspiracy expert” thinks the dead guy wasn’t actually a Rothschild https://themikerothschild.com/2024/12/02/who-was-william-de-rothschild/

Weird that you would suggest getting rid of women’s sports altogether then

The basketball analogy makes more sense than the baseball one. Unless the other team was constantly getting aces by hitting it away from Fleming (who wasn’t really a defensive player anyway), then SJSU was going to be able to get the ball to her if they wanted to. But if you insist, I’ll acknowledge that the fact that she could only muster up Honorable mention All Mountain West conference is better evidence that trannies aren’t going to take over women’s sports than the team not qualifying for the NCAA tournament. I’m not saying to legislate on outcomes. But when someone plays in a league for 3 years and her own teammates don’t even realize she’s a tranny, that’s pretty solid evidence that there wasn’t anything out of the ordinary about her athletic abilities. Heck, Slusser, the one suing over this, transferred to SJSU after Fleming was already on the team the prior year. Surely she had seen some video of their matches. She also played with Fleming in 2023 and yet by her own admission didn’t even realize she was a tranny until this season.

No she said she took showers with him that were “probably inappropriate.” Doesn’t mean he molested her. And I thought the “Pedo Peter” thing came from Hunter.

Wow, this post is riddled with strawman arguments and bad sports analogies. Baseball isn’t really comparable to volleyball. For one there are 3 more players than in volleyball. Not perfect, but a better comparison is probably basketball. Lebron James and a bunch of 10 year olds could qualify for the women’s NCAA tournament. The play where the girl from SDSU got injured wasn’t a penalty, so that argument doesn’t make sense. If you want to play semantics, sure, Fleming can present a safety issue. The same way that any biological woman of similar ability to her (and there are many) can present a safety issue. And once again, I don’t think it’s OK for her to play. But IMO saying that she presents a safety issue shouldn’t be cited as a reason why. My point in saying that she isn’t that good is in response to the “men are taking over women’s sports!” argument. But that doesn’t mean she should be allowed to play, as fairness is the main reason she shouldn’t. Even though she’s not that good by D1 standards, not many girls get the opportunity to play D1 and she is taking a scholarship away from someone else.

From what I’ve read it’s not uncommon for players to get hit like that. If Fleming’s strength was any more than other players’ in the NCAA, then her stats would be much better. Don’t take my word for it though, the Wyoming AD specifically said safety was not a reason they forfeited. The only team I’ve seen mention safety is Nevada. Most of the others just put out vague statements from what I’ve seen. Which again seems odd to me and I hope it was actually the team’s decision. I’m also curious if places like Outkick gave these schools NIL money encouraging them to forfeit

That player never missed a play

What part of “this specific case” do you not understand?

And as I said in that thread, it’s interesting to me that you whine about me “cherry-picking” by not including a sentence which contains a separate thought, when the article you first quoted did it even worse: 1) It also did not include that first sentence that you are yelling at me for not including here 2) It talks about the “nearly 900 medals” first, THEN the topic of mixed sex categories in a separate paragraph, when the actual paper clearly says the nearly 900 medals were FROM the mixed sex categories. 3) Worst of all, it added words that weren’t there! It said “more than 600 biologically female athletes have lost at least 890 medals to transgender competitors,” when the actual paper did not say they were lost to transgender competitors. I’m not “forming an opinion,” it’s basic reading comprehension.

One paragraph can include multiple thoughts. Only an idiot who read that would form the conclusion that the end of that paragraph is referring specifically to trannies. In fact the citation clearly shows a distinction from the beginning of the paragraph to the end. I’ll repeat part of the next post I made in that thread: Yes, the paper (not a study as the article claims) is clearly against trans women participating in women’s sports, but it’s obvious that the numbers cited are referring to where women’s divisions were removed in favor of mixed gender. Both to anyone that understands the English language, as well anyone that understands simple math. It says over 890 medals were lost in over 400 competitions, which if this were only referring to medals lost to trannies, would mean that there was an average of more than 2 trannies medaling in each of the competitions.

@lickin_starfish did, but then again he’s the same guy that was still blaming the Covid vax for someone that died from a drug overdose over a year ago

Too bad YouTube wasn’t around in 1964 or else he would have posted some random interview of one person claiming something tangentially related

Already did

Well these medals weren’t lost to trannies. Will you admit you were wrong?

1. They weren’t lost to transgenders, they were “lost” to actual men because there was no women’s category 2. It wasn’t in the Olympics I already debunked this stupid “story” when @Strike brought it up the first time (with the actual primary source), of course per usual he disappeared after being proven wrong multiple times

I will say the timing was kinda dumb on his part, the night before everyone goes back to their normal routine and will talk about it. Guess the Biden campaign has never heard of a Friday news dump

lol this is a lie

Not sure what you’re getting at here. Are you saying you think Biden will pardon himself? I have no idea if he will, but if he does, then THAT would be a precedent for Trump to pardon himself. Right now it is not.

No, that is not what Biden did, even if you incorrectly think he “effectively” did. The below seems to be accurate…

Disagree. If Joe really sold what you think to the enemy there would be more evidence than just from Hunter. Not to mention they could still subpoena Hunter in an investigation against Joe, or try to get Hunter to turn on Joe Hunter if they have evidence he did anything prior to 2014 or the next time he gets caught with drugs

@Strike, stupid comments like this are why I push back on certain aspects of these discussions while agreeing with the overall point that trans women shouldn’t play women’s sports. A few trannies don’t mean the end of women’s sports. The fact that the athlete in this story couldn’t even qualify her team for the NCAA tournament shows that’s not going to happen. Lia Thomas is pretty much the only significantly accomplished trans woman in the history of NCAA D1, that was two years ago and pretty sure she wouldn’t be eligible under the current rules.

Well wouldn’t Hunter now essentially have immunity to testify against Joe? I’m sure there would be a ton of money in book deals etc in it for him too, and we know he loves money. Weird IMO that you: 1) Seem to think this means Joe is a criminal And 2) Suggest this opens the door for Trump to pardon himself Yet Joe did not pardon himself (though he still can). If he knows he committed crimes why wouldn’t he pardon himself? Pardoning Hunter doesn’t mean people can’t still go after Joe, and it certainly doesn’t mean Joe was a co-conspirator on anything with Hunter.

I’m sure @Frozenbeernuts believes this is actually Hunter in the video

That doesn’t mean he raped her you sicko