Jump to content

TimHauck

Members
  • Content Count

    28,322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by TimHauck

  1. TimHauck

    Male golfer competing for LPGA spot

    You guys must really not think very highly of women’s athleticism. A dude going into the WNBA would have to be pretty good even as a male to make it in the WNBA. Probably like NCAA D2 level IMO. Has there ever even been any trans women in NCAA basketball, particularly D1? Doing a quick search I can’t find any, although there have been trans men that played on women’s teams before taking testosterone.
  2. I look forward to the lawsuit from Ms Khawam (she’s a lawyer after all), if this particular statement directly attributed to her is a lie. Interestingly she did not address this part in her condemnation of the article.
  3. TimHauck

    Non-Binary Divisions in Sports

    Lol at accusing me of cherry picking after you posted this garbage article. The article (as well as others on this subject including NY Post and Fox News) are the ones cherry picking and in this case outright lying by inserting words that were not there. The article (again similar to others I’ve seen) includes both of the two sentences I did, but lists them in different parts of the article, and even puts the second sentence ahead of the first! And again this article adds words that were not there: Quote from article: more than 600 biologically female athletes have lost at least 890 medals to transgender competitors Actual quote in paper: over 600 female athletes in more than 400 competitions have lost more than 890 medals Yes, the paper (not a study as the article claims) is clearly against trans women participating in women’s sports, but it’s obvious that the numbers cited are referring to where women’s divisions were removed in favor of mixed gender. Both to anyone that understands the English language, as well anyone that understands simple math. It says over 890 medals were lost in over 400 competitions, which if this were only referring to medals lost to trannies, would mean that there was an average of more than 2 trannies medaling in each of the competitions. And even if that was a real number, which it’s not, the paper gives no frame of reference for the timeframe, geography, age group, or level of competition. @Strike wrong again, and then doubles down on being wrong, lol. I’ve said before that you need to do a better job vetting your sources and this is yet another example. I prefer to use primary sources and not news articles. But since I’m a nice guy unlike you, I’ll try to help you out. If an article cites a “study,” but doesn’t link to said study as was the case here, there’s a decent chance the article is misinterpreting what the study actually said. If it was a “study” at all which this one wasn’t. HTH and have a good day.
  4. TimHauck

    Non-Binary Divisions in Sports

    Here is the paper: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/sr-vawg-ga79-report-auv_0.pdf And here is the quote in question (page 3): The replacement of the female sports category with a mixed-sex category has resulted in an increasing number of female athletes losing opportunities, including medals, when competing against males. According to information received, by 30 March 2024, over 600 female athletes in more than 400 competitions have lost more than 890 medals in 29 different sports This isn’t talking about losing opportunities to trannies, it’s talking about losing opportunities to actual men because they combined men and women together. It doesn’t even say this happened because of trannies. @Strike wrong again.
  5. He wasn’t indicted (or “indicated,” lol), some randos filed a civil suit against him.
  6. TimHauck

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    For a former model this Williams lady doesn’t look great. Guessing she had kids amirite?
  7. Comparing early voting data vs 2020 is pointless. In 2020 Republicans wanted to follow traditions and only vote on Election Day. Now they want to vote early to supposedly prevent muh fraud
  8. You might be confusing Kamala with @Cdub100
  9. TimHauck

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    Then whine about Biden. Hopefully the Dems haven’t been sitting on this if it’s legit. Many have already voted
  10. TimHauck

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    A vote for 3rd party is a vote for Harris, IMO
  11. TimHauck

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    Do you live in a swing state?
  12. Musk and several right wing “influencers” actually thought it said “Trump is literally Hitler” and did not know it was satire. If you’re complaining about rhetoric (like both you and @Reality have), then it’s not good if you claim something was said that really wasn’t. HTH
  13. This is rich coming from the guy blaming democrat “rhetoric” for a registered Republican wanting to kill Trump
  14. Musk shared a fake headline thinking it was real
  15. TimHauck

    DeAndre Hopkins to the Chiefs

    Literally just dropped him this morning in one league. Not really sure how much better if any his value is though
  16. I do see some showing 15 in 2020. Still not 20 like @Horseman claims
  17. Well @peenie only referred to white women, not all women. And as @Sean Mooney pointed out, Trump won white women in 2020.
  18. *women that participate in polling
  19. No Republican has won the popular vote since 2004. No Republican has won the popular vote by 3+% since 1988. Clinton beat Trump in the popular vote by 2%. Joe Biden won the popular vote by 4% in 2020. No chance there’s a 7% swing in popular vote and if I had to bet I’d probably put it on Harris winning the popular vote but Trump the electoral college.
  20. So you wouldn’t be whining about this if Musk was publicly supporting Harris?
  21. TimHauck

    Al Smith Dinner, Trump wins the election

    So you have no issue that Trump had Fox News do the same thing you were falsely accusing Harris of having NBC do? Shocker
  22. TimHauck

    Al Smith Dinner, Trump wins the election

    Bump for @jonmx
×