whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo:Replied. Read. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt: Read. That offer was just as bad as the offers I've sent you, by the way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo: That offer was just as bad as the offers I've sent you, by the way. As long as you acknowledge how bad yours have been - then I've accomplished alot. We're still waiting for your long-promised arrangement of a good three-way deal... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt: As long as you acknowledge how bad yours have been - then I've accomplished alot. In return, please acknowledge that what you offered me was at least as bad as my offer of Faulk and Holt for Alexander and Moss, or I will be forced to taunt you a second time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo: In return, please acknowledge that what you offered me was at least as bad as my offer of Faulk and Holt for Alexander and Moss, or I will be forced to taunt you a second time. Taunt away - I created a framework where you could get a Raven - something you were begging for in another thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt: Taunt away - I created a framework where you could get a Raven - something you were begging for in another thread. Dude, don't make me out you. I'm talking about your initial offer... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Here we go... Faulk & 5.03 (I would have taken a roster throw-in) -for- Davis & McMicheal With the added info that Heap instead of McMichael would be considered with a (perhaps conditional) '04 pick. Flame away. Hoo's been offering up Faulk for weeks, so it was something worth discussing. But his prior offer was something I wouldn't consider due to Davis & Faulk both being not-young. Replacing 2/3rds of my RB's and not having great rookie fraft picks would be very tough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt:Here we go... Faulk & 5.03 (I would have taken a roster throw-in) -for- Davis & McMicheal With the added info that Heap instead of McMichael would be considered with a (perhaps conditional) '04 pick. Flame away. Hoo's been offering up Faulk for weeks, so it was something worth discussing. But his prior offer was something I wouldn't consider due to Davis & Faulk both being not-young. Replacing 2/3rds of my RB's and not having great rookie fraft picks would be very tough. Dude, I was just focking with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo: Dude, I was just focking with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt: I HATE THAT FOCKING EYE ROLL ICON! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Now anyone who cares can decide for themselves which offer was better (better for both parties - the first is obviously great for 'hoo). And I'm focking with you back. Since you decided "no" to the offer, there's no need to keep the info covert. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo: I HATE THAT FOCKING EYE ROLL ICON! panties panties panties panties panties panties panties panties panties Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt: panties panties panties panties panties panties panties panties panties I just vomited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by grandpahoo: I just vomited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by whoisjgalt:the first is obviously great for 'hoo Nice job trying to sway the vote, by the way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wilzone 0 Posted June 18, 2003 Why don't you two fockers just admit that both offers were lopsided? In a dynasty league, Shaun Alexander probably has a bit more value than Faulk, and then throwing in Moss for Holt makes the trade that much more lopsided. And no one in their right mind would trade Faulk for Stephen Davis and a TE. Both offers sucked donkey balls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grandpahoo 9 Posted June 18, 2003 Originally posted by Wilzone: Both offers sucked donkey balls. My thoughts exactly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
