Trade going down

[orotund 0]

In our league two owners can veto a trade, here is what is proposed:

 

Larry Fitz

Maroney

 

for

 

Roy Williams

Caddy

 

 

Would you allow this trade to go through?

[jagbag 0]

In our league two owners can veto a trade, here is what is proposed:

 

Larry Fitz

Maroney

 

for

 

Roy Williams

Caddy

Would you allow this trade to go through?

 

 

You might as well be the first.

[Jeremy 0]

In our league two owners can veto a trade,

 

 

 

No veto.

[FeelingMN 273]

you have to allow it. Just because roy and caddy are underperforming now doesn't mean they'll continue to do so....as a caddy owner I sure as hell hope this is the case. All in all, the swap seems pretty even to me.

[Parja 0]

In our league two owners can veto a trade, here is what is proposed:

 

Larry Fitz

Maroney

 

for

 

Roy Williams

Caddy

Would you allow this trade to go through?

 

Looks fairly even. Why would you even consider vetoing it?

[UPCman 0]

It's too early in the season to judge this as unfair. Caddy has lots of potential still, as does Williams. And Maroney has been splitting.

 

If you get a chance, help me out with this one:

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=234781

[nicewolf64 0]

when are people going to learn that it takes more info than just the players involved?

 

AND that unless its collusion, vetoing trades is for whimps.

[yodaday 0]

Fair trade, no veto.

[OuttaLuck 0]

What basis, if any, exists for considering a veto of this trade?

[FBH ** 0]

There is no need to veto this trade. Are you sure that Fitz and Maroney will put up better #s than Williams and Caddy? I highly doubt any collusion is going on this early in the season, even if someone lost the first two games they are still not out of the hunt.

 

Collusion is the ONLY reason to veto a trade, and there is no collusion here.

[FlaHawker 24]

when are people going to learn that it takes more info than just the players involved?

 

AND that unless its collusion, vetoing trades is for whimps.

 

Amen brother!

 

I wish the Nancy's in my league would figure this out.

[16 and 33 0]

In our league two owners can veto a trade, here is what is proposed:

 

Larry Fitz

Maroney

 

for

 

Roy Williams

Caddy

 

 

Would you allow this trade to go through?

 

 

 

Without knowing anything about either team or the league scoring system, presumably:

1. the guy trading Fitz has 2/3 solid starters at WR besides Fitz, but maybe has to start a rookie splitting carries
   
2. the guy trading Caddie has a couple solid RB, likes the idea of getting a young player with upside in return, and needs a stud WR
   

If that or something similar is the scenario, then you're looking at two managers who are dealing a strength to shore up a weakness.

 

 

 

Yes, veto if you think either team becomes a playoff contender.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seriously though, why phock with how people want to manage their teams?

[rebooters 1]

when are people going to learn that it takes more info than just the players involved?

 

AND that unless its collusion, vetoing trades is for whimps.

must be a queer to even ask think of vetoing here. id like to punch you in the face.