So the Dems had control of Congress for 40 years, and the Republicans

[Snoopy1 0]

So you can't show me the lie you have been accusing me of.

 

Gotcha.

 

Wow, you are stupid, it's in that very thread. You should't even need it pointed out, you were the one who lied.

[jerryskids 6,813]

I guess I didn't know you had your pulse on the welfare recipients of this country to know how they don't want to take responsibility for themselves and are all just wanting others to take care of them. I'm sure that's an accurate description with your vast knowledge of the system.

My assertion was that on average, welfare recipients are less likely to take personal responsibility than those that aren't. You seem to be saying that that is not the case. Am I correct?

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Wow, you are stupid, it's in that very thread. You should't even need it pointed out, you were the one who lied.

 

 

I linked to the thread where I handed your gerbil-packed ass to you. I have yet to see where you have showed where I lied.

 

[Snoopy1 0]

I linked to the thread where I handed your gerbil-packed ass to you. I have yet to see where you have showed where I lied.

 

 

See that's the problem with you, you just don't read only what you want to read, it's there in black in white.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

I don't see anything there that could remotely be considered a "lie" by any rational, thinking human being.

 

That leaves us in the unenviable position of moving way down the cerebral food chain to your level for your ideas as to what is a lie.

[Snoopy1 0]

I don't see anything there that could remotely be considered a "lie" by any rational, thinking human being.

 

That leaves us in the unenviable position of moving way down the cerebral food chain to your level for your ideas as to what is a lie.

 

 

Then you are completely stupid by any standards. I wouldn't be surprised if you are lying right now in attempt to hide you lied before...

 

Pretty pathetic...

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Still can't back up your accusation, huh?

 

And you call me pathetic.

[Snoopy1 0]

Still can't back up your accusation, huh?

 

And you call me pathetic.

 

Tardio, last time, I pointed it out in that thread. Find it yourself.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Tardio, last time, I pointed it out in that thread. Find it yourself.

 

 

So this is the "last time" you will admit you can't back up your claim.

 

Gotcha.

 

[D'ohmer Simpson 0]

I think this just goes to prove how much more efficient the GOP is...

[FU Rude Rick 0]

Fearing total embarrassment at the polls, the Repubs trot out the ole faithful OBL and terrorism campaign ads

BE AFRAID OF THE TERRORISTS!!!

 

 

Dude, first of all it's UBL, stupid.

 

Secondly, can you blame them for bringing up terrorism? The dems are completly impodent on national security. Jimmy Carter created the wanna be nuclear Iran that we know today. Slick Willie Clinton created the nuclear N. Korea that we have today. What did Clinton do after the first WTC attack in 1993.....NOTHING. What did Clinton do after our embassys in Africa were attacked.....NOTHING. What did Clinton do after the USS COLE was attacked......NOTHING!!!!! See a pattern here? Those ###### that took down the WTC sure saw a pattern you stupid focking idiot!!!!!!

[jerryskids 6,813]

Dude, first of all it's UBL, stupid.

 

Secondly, can you blame them for bringing up terrorism? The dems are completly impodent on national security. Jimmy Carter created the wanna be nuclear Iran that we know today. Slick Willie Clinton created the nuclear N. Korea that we have today. What did Clinton do after the first WTC attack in 1993.....NOTHING. What did Clinton do after our embassys in Africa were attacked.....NOTHING. What did Clinton do after the USS COLE was attacked......NOTHING!!!!! See a pattern here? Those ###### that took down the WTC sure saw a pattern you stupid focking idiot!!!!!!

I love the lib hypocrisy on this. Bush was in office for 9 months when 9/11 happened, therefore he is incompetent. No further attacks happen during his watch, but it is through no effort of his. Bush reminds us that terrorism is still a threat, therefore he is a terrorist himself for making us afraid.

 

[FU Rude Rick 0]

I love the lib hypocrisy on this. Bush was in office for 9 months when 9/11 happened, therefore he is incompetent. No further attacks happen during his watch, but it is through no effort of his. Bush reminds us that terrorism is still a threat, therefore he is a terrorist himself for making us afraid.

 

 

 

 

Oh pleaaaaase, he was in office for 8 months.....verus 8 YEARS.....mmmmmm? Are you serious, no effort? Every time we try and do something to combat them (ie: tapping phones of terrorists, tracking their money, interrogating them) the dems and their scumbag aclu buddies are the first ones to defend them!!!

 

Here are something that us republicans call FACTS!!!!!

 

 

 

1. On missile defense of America — Democrats voted against it.

 

2. On the Patriot Act — Democrats voted against it.

 

3. On tapping foreign terrorists’ phone calls to the U.S. — Democrats voted against it.

 

4. On tracing terrorists’ money flow between foreign banks — Democrats voted against it.

 

5. On building a border wall to control illegal immigration and stop dope — dealers, terrorists and criminals — Democrats voted against it.

 

6. On interrogating captured terrorists — 194 Democrats just voted against it.

[jerryskids 6,813]

Oh pleaaaaase, he was in office for 8 months.....verus 8 YEARS.....mmmmmm? Are you serious, no effort? Every time we try and do something to combat them (ie: tapping phones of terrorists, tracking their money, interrogating them) the dems and their scumbag aclu buddies are the first ones to defend them!!!

 

Here are something that us republicans call FACTS!!!!!

1. On missile defense of America — Democrats voted against it.

 

2. On the Patriot Act — Democrats voted against it.

 

3. On tapping foreign terrorists’ phone calls to the U.S. — Democrats voted against it.

 

4. On tracing terrorists’ money flow between foreign banks — Democrats voted against it.

 

5. On building a border wall to control illegal immigration and stop dope — dealers, terrorists and criminals — Democrats voted against it.

 

6. On interrogating captured terrorists — 194 Democrats just voted against it.

Either you didn't read my post or you are supporting the Dems. Pick one.

[Toro 1]

Oh pleaaaaase, he was in office for 8 months.....verus 8 YEARS.....mmmmmm? Are you serious, no effort? Every time we try and do something to combat them (ie: tapping phones of terrorists, tracking their money, interrogating them) the dems and their scumbag aclu buddies are the first ones to defend them!!!

 

Here are something that us republicans call FACTS!!!!!

1. On missile defense of America — Democrats voted against it.

 

2. On the Patriot Act — Democrats voted against it.

 

3. On tapping foreign terrorists’ phone calls to the U.S. — Democrats voted against it.

 

4. On tracing terrorists’ money flow between foreign banks — Democrats voted against it.

 

5. On building a border wall to control illegal immigration and stop dope — dealers, terrorists and criminals — Democrats voted against it.

 

6. On interrogating captured terrorists — 194 Democrats just voted against it.

 

Not too mention...

 

Senate approves Iraq war resolution

Administration applauds vote

 

Friday, October 11, 2002 Posted: 12:35 PM EDT (1635 GMT)

 

The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.

 

 

Bush lied.

[FU Rude Rick 0]

Either you didn't read my post or you are supporting the Dems. Pick one.

 

 

 

 

I'm sorry I thought you were being serious not sarcastic.

 

Not too mention...

 

Bush lied.

 

 

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

 

 

 

I wonder what "unmistakable evidence" he's refering to? Did he hear it straight from Bush's mouth? I don't think so, moron.

[Toro 1]

I'm sorry I thought you were being serious not sarcastic.

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

I wonder what "unmistakable evidence" he's refering to? Did he hear it straight from Bush's mouth? I don't think so, moron.

 

Hey dumbass. I am on your side.

[FU Rude Rick 0]

Hey dumbass. I am on your side.

 

 

 

Again, sorry. I wasn't sure