My Frontrunner: Guilliani

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Don't really read your own shiit, do ya? Let me read it to you, sport:

The thread you reference ?

1) Wasn't "started" by you, it was started by MCMKLAA and:

2) Wasn't 'weeks' ago, it was nine days ago.

..and it still took you what 2 hours just to dig THAT one up?

Again, Pathetic.

 

Semantics. Owned. Thanks for playing.

[wiffleball 4,790]

Semantics. Owned. Thanks for playing.

 

 

Yeah, you really "owned" me with that one. You lied and got busted on it. Yup, that's 'semantics', allrighty. You try to make the case that you actually contribute - and don't have to support your position when I call you on it - by saying you already started two threads on the subject: The first one has absolutely NO back-up and the 2nd one doesn't exist at all.

 

Tragic. That's just pathetic that you can't even back up the little original thought you DO post (which BTW: Congrats on not having to cut and paste it, at least)

 

FYI:

 

Semantics: Using two words to describe the same thing.

 

Lying: Claiming you started a thread that someone else did.

 

And, that's why everyone thinks of you a huge douche troll. Notice how everybody else actually contributed their own originial thoughts and opinions herein? Do you see how you stand-out from the others? All you seem to be able to do is make nonsensical attacks on other people, and when you're actually called to contribute, you have lie about yourself rather than simply rise to the challenge of contributing something worthwhile.

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Yeah, you really "owned" me with that one. You lied and got busted on it. Yup, that's 'semantics', allrighty. You try to make the case that you actually contribute - and don't have to support your position when I call you on it - by saying you already started two threads on the subject: The first one has absolutely NO back-up and the 2nd one doesn't exist at all.

 

Tragic. That's just pathetic that you can't even back up the little original thought you DO post (which BTW: Congrats on not having to cut and paste it, at least)

 

FYI:

 

Semantics: Using two words to describe the same thing.

 

Lying: Claiming you started a thread that someone else did.

 

I never said I started the thread by MCLkka or whoever, but I did provide you with what I posted in his thread. But is that really whats at issue here? I think not. The issue is you are late to the party and lazy, whether started by me or not, use the search function. With your participation level of this forum you would think that you'd have figured that out by now.

 

Just saying.

 

Maybe go have a beer or xanax.

[wiffleball 4,790]

I never said I started the thread by MCLkka or whoever,

 

Dude, you lied.

 

 

1) When you got called out for not having an inteligent thought to provide, You said you said you started two threads on Rudy. You didn't. THAT's a lie.

Use the search function, thats what its there for, I started two threads on this weeks ago....one serious and one not so serious.

 

2) Even if I tried to use the search function - which I did - your lie made it impossible to find the thread you didn't start.

3) When I called you on it, you LIED again, instead of just owning up to it.

And uh, yeah - ONE thread in the past two month. (other than 300 Global Warming cut and pastes)

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...100&hl=rudy

Not that strong of a fact finder are ya?

4) Then you posted a link 'proving' that you started two threads - never ONCE mentioning that you DIDN'T start that thread. - And I had to bust you on that too.

Rudy Giuliani, Can he get elected? MLCKAA Feb 10 2007, 03:22 PM

 

And you still haven't owned up to ANY of your lies. You just keep making up more.

 

 

You've tried to take credit for another guy's thread. You repeatedly make statements that you can't back up when you're called on it, and You lied again in this thread, you lied to justify you NOT be able to provide any adequate commentary herein. You consistently post material that clearly isn't yours - and refuse to cite its source.

 

Do us a favor: Either add value or get the fock off. Nobody needs some half-wit troll who pulls the crap you pull. This thread is the ultimate culmination of all your crap in one bucket. Your lying, your lack of integrity and your lack of anything intelligent to offer. - When all you really had to do - to not be a focking douche - is either contribute, or leave the discussion.

[Boz/BoFan 0]

Dude, you lied.

1) When you got called out for not having an inteligent thought to provide, You said you said you started two threads on Rudy. You didn't. THAT's a lie.

2) Even if I tried to use the search function - which I did - your lie made it impossible to find the thread you didn't start.

3) When I called you on it, you LIED again, instead of just owning up to it.

4) Then you posted a link 'proving' that you started two threads - never ONCE mentioning that you DIDN'T start that thread. - And I had to bust you on that too.

 

And you still haven't owned up to ANY of your lies.

You've tried to take credit for another guy's thread. You repeatedly make statements that you can't back up when you're called on it, and You lied again in this thread, you lied to justify you NOT be able to provide any adequate commentary herein. You consistently post material that clearly isn't yours - and refuse to cite its source.

 

Do us a favor: Either add value or get the fock off. Nobody needs some half-wit troll who pulls the crap you pull. This thread is the ultimate culmination of all your crap in one bucket. Your lying, your lack of integrity and your lack of anything intelligent to offer. - When all you really had to do - to not be a focking douche - is either contribute, or leave the discussion.

 

 

Tell me where I specifically claimed to have started a thread that was started by someone else? I said there were two threads weeks ago about Giuliani that I started. One specifically about him and one that was not initially about him but evolved into discussion about him. The one started by MCKLAA was one that i used to show you that I provided legitimate info on the possible Rep. nominee, which I never once claimed to have started....which would be insanely impossible to defend with his focking name on it and all.

 

Not a xanax or a beer. A xanax AND a beer. You need to lighten up suzy.

[wiffleball 4,790]

I said there were two threads weeks ago about Giuliani that I started. One specifically about him and one that was not initially about him but evolved into discussion about him.

 

No, you didn't - here's what you said - Verbatim:

Use the search function, thats what its there for, I started two threads on this weeks ago....one serious and one not so serious.

 

More lies.

 

You DO understand your shiit's in writing, right?

 

 

 

And uh, yeah - ONE thread in the past two months. (other than 300 Global Warming cut and pastes)

 

And you respond with...

 

[a thread not started by you] http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...100&hl=rudy

Not that strong of a fact finder are ya?

 

 

We used to have an "ignore" feature. Hoping I can find it again. There are people I disagree with on the bored, but damn few who pull the worthless crap you pull. You're just not worth the time.

[jets24 6]

If I have to pull this car over.....

[Boz/BoFan 0]

More lies.

 

You DO understand your shiit's in writing, right?

And you respond with...

We used to have an "ignore" feature. Hoping I can find it again. There are people I disagree with on the bored, but damn few who pull the worthless crap you pull. You're just not worth the time.

 

 

Ok, let me try, "You DO understand your shiit's in writing, right?" WRONG, its TYPED on a forum. Thats basically what you are doing here with your weak azz sleazy criminal lawyer tactics.

 

You said I never provide anything of value, I then provided you a post I made of value......NEVER saying I started said thread. I did mention I started OTHER threads, but never the one you keep insisting I specifically said I started.

 

We can do this all day but I would have to assume it would eat into your 100 post per day quota. Now get back to work you Siren you.

[Voltaire 5,314]

I never heard about nor care that Guiliani had an affair except in one detal. Somebody please confirm Guiliani's press secretarty is a hottie. It's embarassing the women that President Clinton settles for, I'd hope Rudy would be more -er- discerning.