Is it time to start Chris Henry?

[bgard72 10]

Guys,

 

I have the following situation at WR...I start 3, 1 pt for 10 yards, 6 pts for TD:

 

1) TO

2) Jennings

3) ???

 

Here are my options:

A. Reggie Brown @ Washington - healthy and due for a score, but will Washington slow down the Eagles this week?

 

B. Deion Branch vs SF - is questionable, Holmgren wanted to see Deion at practice on Saturday and make a decision. If he does start, he may be limited

 

C. Chris Henry @ Baltimore - first week back, but I've been hearing of the depleted Ravens secondary (Rolle out, Reed may be out, more?)

 

Who would you slot in the #3 WR position this week?

 

Thanks and leave yours.

[prostrollo 1]

Guys,

 

I have the following situation at WR...I start 3, 1 pt for 10 yards, 6 pts for TD:

 

1) TO

2) Jennings

3) ???

 

Here are my options:

A. Reggie Brown @ Washington - healthy and due for a score, but will Washington slow down the Eagles this week?

 

B. Deion Branch vs SF - is questionable, Holmgren wanted to see Deion at practice on Saturday and make a decision. If he does start, he may be limited

 

C. Chris Henry @ Baltimore - first week back, but I've been hearing of the depleted Ravens secondary (Rolle out, Reed may be out, more?)

 

Who would you slot in the #3 WR position this week?

 

Thanks and leave yours.

 

Safe pick would be brown but I would roll the dice with Henry

[lagarzlebrew 0]

Henry, and its not even close

[stuckpixel 0]

Does the matchup look hard? If it looks tight I might stick with Brown, but if you have a bit of breathing room, I'd try your luck with Chris "You better pick up that ######" Henry.

 

Have a look at mine if you get the chance:

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=301305

[Francis Soyer 0]

I would go with Henry. First game back so he will want to show something. Also, as the 3rd WR, he will draw the bottom of the barrell Raven's DBs. Bengals will not be able to run much and will need to throw a lot to win.

[mikemusc 0]

Henry.

 

Thanks for mine

[Nomad99 754]

Guys,

 

I have the following situation at WR...I start 3, 1 pt for 10 yards, 6 pts for TD:

 

1) TO

2) Jennings

3) ???

 

Here are my options:

A. Reggie Brown @ Washington - healthy and due for a score, but will Washington slow down the Eagles this week?

 

B. Deion Branch vs SF - is questionable, Holmgren wanted to see Deion at practice on Saturday and make a decision. If he does start, he may be limited

 

C. Chris Henry @ Baltimore - first week back, but I've been hearing of the depleted Ravens secondary (Rolle out, Reed may be out, more?)

 

Who would you slot in the #3 WR position this week?

 

Thanks and leave yours.

 

 

Branch doesn't even factor in so........That leaves Brown & Henry.

 

Henry will be looking at anywhere from 15-55 yds with 1 TD vs a VERY suspect BALT D................IF Cinci gets him into the fold this week.

 

Brown...This guy with any elite QB would have much better stats than he does..........unfortunately he does not have an elite QB..........McNabb is obviously not as dangerous as he once was. Washington prefers to run the ball & has a better Pass D.

Unless they get down big, PHI will rely on Westy.

 

 

As tempted as I'd be to pick Henry........BALT just does not put points up on the board & the D is a mess right now.......I think Cinci will not need to air it out to win the game.......they have enough balance to hang w/BALT & won't need to put up 30 pts to win.

 

PHI needs this win, McNabb needs this win. Wash will run, run, run. McNabb will be throwing the ball......to everyone. PHI knows that the WAS Pass D is not as good as previously assumed. WAS WR's have NO

TD's so far this year PHI can control the game with Westy & give McNabb the opportunity at a few plays.

 

I lean towards Reggie.......potential for more yds & the same chance of scoring

[mrgymrat 0]

Yep, the time is now! This is why you have been holding onto him since he hasn't been able to play. The Bengals O will explode from here on out (although w/ no DST it will be too little, too late)