quikpoor 0 Posted October 9, 2008 Guys, I have a trade that seems fishy: D.Garrard for C.Portis. As commissioner, can I overturn this trade? The guy with Portis is 0-5 and does need a QB, but this seems bad. We start 1 QB, 2RB, plus a flex that can be another RB or WR Team 1 (0-5) M. Hasselbeck B. Quinn C. Benson C. Portis J. Lewis R. Brown C. Perry Team 2 (3-2) A. Rodgers D. Garrard M. Bulger J. Norwood L. Johnson M. Turner K. Jones L. McClain Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimptaddy 0 Posted October 9, 2008 I normally say allow all trades, but this one does look fishy. Portis is a #1 stud RB and a QB as good as Gerrard can be found on most waiver wires. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FrankRizzo 0 Posted October 9, 2008 Rodgers for Portis ... then we are talking! But if the boy needs a QB you have to let it go through ..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mmueller 0 Posted October 9, 2008 Veto that ######. Bull ######. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uwmalcolm 73 Posted October 9, 2008 Veto! The trade doesn't even help the guy...Hasselbeck is just as good as Garrard. It doesn't smell good at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blaneyfan 0 Posted October 9, 2008 I'd at least be asking team #1 why he is making such a horrible trade. What's his relationship with the Team #2 owner? and is this a money league? Definitely warrants some investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killersquids 3 Posted October 9, 2008 I'd at least be asking team #1 why he is making such a horrible trade. What's his relationship with the Team #2 owner? and is this a money league? Definitely warrants some investigation. I second this.....it would be tough to justify this trade. I am an anti-veto commish, but there does come a point where a veto is needed. There has always been two sides to this (assuming there isn't collusion), and it has to do with.....I'm almost afraid to say it......the competitive balance of the league. I believe there is such a thing and it needs to be protected. The more I think about it, the more inclined I am to veto it. I would need to hear a great reason from the Portis owner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bills04 46 Posted October 10, 2008 What?!? Uh - no way; VETO that trade! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites