drmidd 2 Posted October 26, 2008 I have Marshall on bye. Boldin is questionable and Holmes is deactivated. If Boldin doesnt go I was planning on grabbiong Breaston. But I need someone to take Holmes place. Out of these guys who would you take. Cotchery (if he plays) Stuckey (if Cotchery doesnt play) Holt (Avery is also there. Jackson 50-50. so pass more on NE?) N. Washington (starting in place of Holmes) Camarillo All Eagle WRs except Jackson are there So what do you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djurynk 0 Posted October 26, 2008 I think the surest WR is Carmillo that being said HOLT may turn out big this week. Being a Steelers fan consider Nate but I think this will be a low scoring field possession game, ctachery too unsuyre to start him, Stucky not sold on him, Curtis a possibility but not sure how his timing and health make him. Please see mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=330544 GOOD LUCK! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Timinator 0 Posted October 26, 2008 I like Washington because Curtis and Boldin need more time to get up to speed. If you believe the Pitt game will be a grinder, consider Boldin. A handful of plays from him could equal a whole day of someone else. Admit I'm a little biased against Carillo though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Connorsdad 38 Posted October 26, 2008 Year i like the Breaston pickup and for Holmes i would go with Torry Holt Goodluck!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GreatGray 2 Posted October 26, 2008 How about Josh Morgan on SF? I'd think about him if he's available. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drmidd 2 Posted October 26, 2008 How about Josh Morgan on SF? I'd think about him if he's available. Nope he's already gone. Avery is gone now also Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fostersfutbol 1 Posted October 26, 2008 Thanks for mine. I was in similar boat as you and picked up Nate Washington. May be a grinder but at least at home, unlike Holt. Truth be told I think this one's a toss up. I'd take Nate, but I think both Nate and Holt will have 70-80 yards, with equal likelihood to get into the end zone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites