Who you like best @ FLEX?

[IMMensaMind 459]

It's a .5/PPR league, and right now I'm leaning towards Ingram, but not at all confident in that. I also like Tate here vs MIA (and I have Foster, so playing Tate @ FLEX is insurance as well, and it should be a blowout) too, and Amendola should be good for 6-7rcpts.

 

What you all think?

[dpbuddha 9]

I have a similar issue in wondering if I should plug Tate in. In your case I think Amendola is a decent play as a flex. I'd go with that but my #2 choice would be Tate...not Ingram.

 

Please see one of my 2 posts if you can.

[saut 7]

Which williams are we talkin about here?

[team awesome 4]

Go with amendola. safe option. hell probably get 8-9 balls his way and 5-7 receptions because the other WRs are unknowns. I think later in the season, they use tate more to give foster a little break but not this early in the season.

 

see mine : http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=405585

[IMMensaMind 459]

Which williams are we talkin about here?

 

Oops. Ryan Williams.

 

My thinking on Tate is that Miami is going to be blowout - and Tate was a 1000 yd rusher himself last year. I also think Ingram could get a lot of work inside the 20 as well, so I like him too.

 

Argh.

[AlvinGreeneAllStars 0]

It's a .5/PPR league, and right now I'm leaning towards Ingram, but not at all confident in that. I also like Tate here vs MIA (and I have Foster, so playing Tate @ FLEX is insurance as well, and it should be a blowout) too, and Amendola should be good for 6-7rcpts.

 

What you all think?

 

Amendola is the safe play. I would want to see touches for Williams and Tate before I started them.

 

Help with Mine Please

[jackjohn 31]

Gotta go Amendola here. See how Tate and Williams are used this week in actual game situations. If your not sold on him, then Tate would be next. But I believe Amendola has the biggest upside.

 

Thanks for mine!