dreen626 17 Posted September 16, 2013 Tate is super average in a Rn heavy offense. Why was he so hyped? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,345 Posted September 16, 2013 Tate is super average in a Rn heavy offense. Why was he so hyped? I don't know about the "hype" aspect,(well, yea I do, since I drafted him last year in a die nasty) but he is a solid player. Once Wilson gets his groove on, Tate will do just fine. Also, he's a Domer. Bunch of leprechauns in the media still. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WR Guru 31 Posted September 16, 2013 I think he's been the victim of a couple of bad matchups so far, but it has been disappointing that Seattle doesn't seem all that interested in getting him involved. Really expected Seattle to get him more touches this year, what with how much he progressed last year, all the glowing reports from camp, and especially with Harvin gone. Well, it's early still... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Hood 9 Posted September 16, 2013 When or where was he so hyped exactly? I seem to have missed it. Once Harvin got hurt while Rice was still dealing with knee problems it was assumed he would be the best WR to own on Seattle I recall. Still may be. But anyone who thought that actually meant high or steady production for a run first and second team was just silly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites