DrG 103 Posted June 5, 2015 The new rule begs the question: What teams are likely go for or NOT to go for the 2 point very often? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,183 Posted June 5, 2015 I think teams may still just go for the single point since return from the defense will now net them 2 points. Thats a huge swing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted June 5, 2015 Inclement weather Shaky kicker Solid red zone offense Power back Deflated balls Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scott46984 0 Posted June 6, 2015 I think you're looking for something that isn't there. My opinion is that teams will continue to kick it with about the same percentage as they did before, maybe a very small change but doubt it will be meaningful. Still think what they should do is just eliminate the kick and make all XP's scrimmage plays - then it would be a meaningful play. This is a baby step that makes the league feel like they're doing something but in reality will lead to mimimal change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,183 Posted June 6, 2015 I think you're looking for something that isn't there. My opinion is that teams will continue to kick it with about the same percentage as they did before, maybe a very small change but doubt it will be meaningful. Still think what they should do is just eliminate the kick and make all XP's scrimmage plays - then it would be a meaningful play. This is a baby step that makes the league feel like they're doing something but in reality will lead to mimimal change. I think they should remove the defense on XP attempts altogether. The offense makes as stylish of a play as they can, getting the ball into the endzone. This is followed by a choreographed dance. Then a panel of judges rates their play and dance on a scale of 1-3, resulting in that many points added to the score. This will eliminate concussions and will get women more interested in the game. Win win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scott46984 0 Posted June 7, 2015 I think they should remove the defense on XP attempts altogether. The offense makes as stylish of a play as they can, getting the ball into the endzone. This is followed by a choreographed dance. Then a panel of judges rates their play and dance on a scale of 1-3, resulting in that many points added to the score. This will eliminate concussions and will get women more interested in the game. Win win. um.....sure OK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gypsybrat 117 Posted June 7, 2015 I think they should remove the defense on XP attempts altogether. The offense makes as stylish of a play as they can, getting the ball into the endzone. This is followed by a choreographed dance. Then a panel of judges rates their play and dance on a scale of 1-3, resulting in that many points added to the score. This will eliminate concussions and will get women more interested in the game. Win win. It would also provide experience for future contestants of Dancing with the Stars. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scothawk 2 Posted June 9, 2015 I think they should remove the defense on XP attempts altogether. The offense makes as stylish of a play as they can, getting the ball into the endzone. This is followed by a choreographed dance. Then a panel of judges rates their play and dance on a scale of 1-3, resulting in that many points added to the score. This will eliminate concussions and will get women more interested in the game. Win win. This is just plain stupid and will never happen ---- because choreography is a fifteen yard penalty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites