Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Burt

Rodgers/Rawls for Peterson/Bortles?

Recommended Posts

10 team, 5 player keeper league (keep max of 3 times); start 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1Flex

 

I give Peterson, Bortles and my 1st round pick next year for Rodgers, Rawls and his 7th rounder next year.

 

Current roster is:

 

QB Bortles

RB David Johnson, Peterson, Lacy (cant keep next year), Foster, Michael, Powell

WR Moncrief, Decker, Diggs, J Brown, Parker, Lockett (lost Allen to the IR)

 

Obviously, I'd counter for something other than his 7th rounder (like a 3rd-5th rounder) if I were to act on this, but am I crazy for even considering it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a chance I would do that. A top RB has more value than a top QB, and you're giving up the better draft pick. Using your RB depth to upgrade at WR is more of a need for you than QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even know how this improves your team.

 

Sure Rodgers > Bortles, but Bortles is looking like he could be a consistent fantasy threat.

 

That being said, Peterson is more valuable compared to Rawls than Rodgers is to Bortles.

 

I know you have Michael, but it's not like Rawls is the clear every down back and you'd have his insurance; even though Rawls is the starter, it's going to be a timeshare.

 

Peterson is the Vikings' bellcow.

 

Throwing in a 1st for a 7th (or any other pick other than his 1st) is ludicrous.

 

I agree with one of the other posters -- if you need to shore up any position, it's WR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×