jctds 4 Posted October 1, 2018 Was offered Melvin Gordon, Funchess, and Chargers D for Green, Lynch, and Miller. Not a big fan of trading for a defense, especially a middling one...Am thinking of countering with one of the following:1) Gordon, Funchess, and Reed for Green, Lynch, and Miller.2) Gordon, Funchess and Chargers D for Adams, Lynch, and Miller.Do any of the three scenarios make sense for me?.5PPR12 TeamsQB: Cousins, MayfieldRB: Michel, Lynch, Miller, Drake, IngramWR: Green, Adams, Robinson, Cooper, AgholorTE: Howard, Hurst Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,461 Posted October 1, 2018 I wouldnt give up M Gordon. So I would go get him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mark91G 13 Posted October 1, 2018 agree with above get gordon is the main thing here. its up to you what WR you would be willing to give up if he will take adams then do it funchess has been doing well with olsen out and has already had his bye week Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobjay00 22 Posted October 1, 2018 Do it! What are you waiting for? This improves your team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jctds 4 Posted October 1, 2018 So everyone thinks that any form of this trade makes sense for me? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scottsind 61 Posted October 1, 2018 Melvin Gordon up for trade. Yes I will take him. Green, Lynch, and Miller might be a lot, but Ingram coming back fulfills your RB2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShawnStar 1 Posted October 3, 2018 Take players over defense unless its the bears or some other team that adds 7-8 more points a week for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
