F1erce 88 Posted September 4, 2024 …why are they given responsibilities? According to the looney left, Kamala as VP “couldn’t do anything” in this country cause “she’s just the vice president” If the VP, isn’t important then why have them at all? Can any of the resident board libs tell me that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,209 Posted September 4, 2024 Don’t conservatives have a VP? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
purdygood 355 Posted September 4, 2024 13 minutes ago, F1erce said: …why are they given responsibilities? According to the looney left, Kamala as VP “couldn’t do anything” in this country cause “she’s just the vice president” If the VP, isn’t important then why have them at all? Can any of the resident board libs tell me that? At first, the loser of the Election became Vice President. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,704 Posted September 4, 2024 1 hour ago, F1erce said: …why are they given responsibilities? According to the looney left, Kamala as VP “couldn’t do anything” in this country cause “she’s just the vice president” If the VP, isn’t important then why have them at all? Can any of the resident board libs tell me that? She cast 40 tie-breaking senate votes as vice president. That is a lot of power. Yet, there are numerous first ladies that have accomplished much more than she has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BarneyFife 35 Posted September 5, 2024 Basically Vice Presidents have no power whatsoever. That is unless they replace the president. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,099 Posted September 5, 2024 9 hours ago, purdygood said: At first, the loser of the Election became Vice President. The kameltoe was the biggest loser. She lost the option to be in the election because the libtards didn't give her a chance to win because she's retarded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites