Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bobpate17

need help getting S. SMITH.

Recommended Posts

My team is in my sign. A friend in my league really needs depth. I offered TO, Shockey and Jones-drew for SS/ M. Barber. I am starting colston as TE always so shockey is useless to me after this week. I have gore as my back up so I can loose drew-jones. Is this fair trade??? Drew-jones has good potential and TO/Shockey is top tire WR/TE. Am I taking too much from him or is this fair trade? he is a friend so I don't want to rip him off. would it be more fair if I did SS / TO, drew, shockey.

 

HIS team

brady, Bledso

fitz, SS, branch

M. barber, Betts, Bush

J witten

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I think you're making a pretty fair trade. For one, Jones-Drew seems good for 10-20 touches a game so far, and I wouldn't be too surprised to see him score a few more times this season, including possibly a return TD (though another 2-TD game's probably not gonna happen unless Taylor gets hurt, but... it IS Fred Taylor).

 

TO and Shockey will both start for him as well. I think you're fine asking for Barber.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My team is in my sign. A friend in my league really needs depth. I offered TO, Shockey and Jones-drew for SS/ M. Barber. I am starting colston as TE always so shockey is useless to me after this week. I have gore as my back up so I can loose drew-jones. Is this fair trade??? Drew-jones has good potential and TO/Shockey is top tire WR/TE. Am I taking too much from him or is this fair trade? he is a friend so I don't want to rip him off. would it be more fair if I did SS / TO, drew, shockey.

 

HIS team

brady, Bledso

fitz, SS, branch

M. barber, Betts, Bush

J witten

 

I think your friend is getting the better of the deal. He's getting the depth he needs, and since the trade doesn't hurt you, and may actually help you, I think it's more than fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say the trade is fair. I traded steve smith for matt hassle

 

 

I think I would have to hold on to steve smith in this trade. I refuse to liquidate studs especially for underproforming players (see Shockey)

 

Thanks for replying in mine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×