CajunBadger

Thanks! Last game I had weepaws QB stamp of approval which worked out great, so hoping can get it this time as well

Quick question..Lamar or Maye today? I'm going with Lamar at the moment.. He had issues with CIN two weeks ago, but feeling he is definitely healthier with more confidence in his running, etc. Also updated weather saying could be snow showers ending towards the start of the Patriots game. Just very, very cold for the Ravens game. Thanks!!

Not arguing lol Just clarifying that I'm looking at usage... And coaching sounded like they were still behind Vidal being involved if I'd heard correctly..

Sorry to ask, but I'm curious why all are saying Hampton? Is it due to believing he'll get a bigger workload now that it's his 2nd game back? At the moment it seems to be in an equal timeshare with Vidal at best, sounded like coaches want to keep Vidal involved, and not sure today's match up is all that great. I definitely want to field the best players I can, so please do correct me if I'm thinking wrong!

Thanks! ..had seen something on FantasyPros regarding PS2's dominance (not saying I'm ignoring Stingley and HOU, but at least Wilson has been getting a lot of targets consistently). Lol, that game goes back to 2023 but could have some bearing still..and since CWat has returned, he's trended to being their WR1 with Doubs and Wicks (and now Reed instead) as their WR2s..ofc ignoring last game with only 4 targets. But yeah, all that does make for a (too) risky CWat this week so figure best to sit him this week! And best of luck to you!!

Got Jeanty, Warren, Hampton, Monangai - need 2 (PPR). Currently starting Jeanty and Warren.. I'm thinking Hampton has Vidal too involved still, but maybe I should consider starting Monangai over Warren? Thanks!

Harder to know between bad offense/3rd string QB (Hall) or timeshare (Monangai)! Seems CLE run D not been doing as well of late, so would give a lean to Monangai.

I think you've got it (Wilson, Wan'Dale, and Sutton). Wilson should still have a decent floor due to receptions, but just not sure if he'll go off like he has.. Personally still trying to decide between him and CWat, where both are risky with potential upside, lol Good luck!

Thanks so far for all the input...lol, votes overall are: 3 for Meyers, 2 for Wan'Dale, Watson, and Sutton and 1 vote given to Wilson (in place of a Sutton vote). Am thinking it comes down to either 1) Meyers, Wan'Dale, and CWat or 2) Meyers, Wan'Dale, and Wilson (believing Brisset/Wilson can overcome the HOU D and Stingley's personal touch). HOU has only allowed 4 WRs to score over 13 PPR points but Wilson could be the 5th! Perhaps a little safer with same/slightly more upside is CWat, but he'll likely have PS2 covering for at least part of the game, and DEN been stingy on receiving TDs? Any additional thoughts? Again thanks and best of luck to everyone in moving onto the next round!!

I need two and a flex (PPR) from MWilson, CWat, Meyers, Wan'Dale, Flowers, Sutton I'm currently starting MWilson (must start imo no matter what), Wan'Dale, and Meyers (or am also considering CWat). MWilson - no MHJ but HOU D with Stingley could give Brissett/MWilson diffculties, lol Wan'Dale - gets the targets but with Dart yds/reception been low CWat - 10, 7, 4 targets but is GB's WR1 and producing very well, but will he or Doubs/Reed have PS2 covering them the most? Meyers - solid but do still worry a little about TLaw.. Flowers - Is Lamar's WR1, but was shut down by Turner last game and previous meetings too.. Sutton - looks like Franklin is finally taking a back seat again, but prefer seeing it in one more game.. Thanks!

Wilson, Olave. At least imo, I don't see one sitting Wilson.. But this logic did backfire on me back in the NYJ-DEN game when PS2 and Sauce shut down my GWilson and Sutton! I have Zay but am leaning towards sitting him. Last game he almost had the one TD reception (lousy OPI call negated it), but otherwise was held to 1 yd on 6 targets by DJ Turner. And from what reading, hasn't done well against him in past meetings either. Also wondering if they won't try more of a ground game along and increase targets to Likely (Andrews sounding like he's trending towards being out).

Just play it as you normally would.. Never know if karma or what will kick in otherwise, lol

Wilson ofc.. 2nd option is tougher by far. Would give a lean to Higgins. If the Saints offense was involving Neal more heavily in the passing game, I'd say him. But as was with Kamara before and now Neal, they're just not passing as much to their RBs. Still getting a handful of targets, but not enough to compensate for awful run blocking, etc lol. Agree Vidal could get shut down and Hebert's hand has any impact on his game, it could be a bad week for Vidal.. Marks def gets the volume but just hasn't had good results even in the positive matchups.. Good luck!

ARSB if plays, MWilson if he doesn't..

Thanks! I'm pulling my hair out here, lol..I really don't want to drop a potential starter (now figure it'd be Flowers or Monangai) for a one week QB rental. But as is said in the following write-up, 0 TDs in the last 4 games for Lamar! Plus Steeler D has gotten better during the last 4 games: " Across his last four games, he has finished as the QB15, QB29, QB25, and QB27 in weekly scoring. Since Week 10, among 35 qualifying passers, he ranks 16th in yards per attempt, 35th in highly accurate throw rate, and 29th in catchable target rate. It has been horrible. There's no way around that, and if Jackson can't supplement his struggling passing production with rushing equity, it's tough to trust him in fantasy. Now, as I write this, watch Jackson go out and have a massive bounce-back game against a struggling defense in a divisional game and spike everything I just said in my face. That's the risk of benching Jackson this week, but we can also say that he hasn't played well over the last four games. Since Week 9, Pittsburgh's pass defense has picked up the slack, allowing the seventh-fewest yards per attempt, the ninth-lowest passer rating, the fourth-lowest CPOE, and the eighth-lowest success rate per dropback."