Let Da Big Dog Eat 40 Posted February 4, 2007 This guy is the worst anal-ist in the NFL. What a tool and a voice that is worse than the sounds eminating from me after a bean burrito. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Blue 06 195 Posted February 4, 2007 This guy is the worst anal-ist in the NFL. What a tool and a voice that is worse than the sounds eminating from me after a bean burrito. With all due respect, Gumble has something to say about that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UncleHulka 0 Posted February 4, 2007 It isn't as if this matchup deserves any better. Bears and Colts the two best teams in the NFL this year? Yeah, right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted February 5, 2007 Simms is pretty good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted February 5, 2007 It isn't as if this matchup deserves any better. Bears and Colts the two best teams in the NFL this year? Yeah, right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ravens 03 0 Posted February 5, 2007 It isn't as if this matchup deserves any better. Bears and Colts the two best teams in the NFL this year? Yeah, right. The AFC had 4 of the top 5 teams in the NFL this year. CHI maybe was #5. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PastorOfMuppets 0 Posted February 5, 2007 The AFC had 4 of the top 5 teams in the NFL this year. CHI NEW ORLEANS maybe was #5. I think the Saints had the better team, top to bottom. But, give DA BEARS their due, they clinched homefield, and got the Saints in Chi-town in January. How much better would yesterday have been with: Brees, Bush, Deuce, Colston, Horn, Henderson, Copper ... methinks a more entertaining affair, for sure. Not to take anything away from the Bears ... they earned that spot yesterday. PS- Simms is tEh SUCKAGE as an analyst. That asswipe bores me to tears. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UncleHulka 0 Posted February 5, 2007 The AFC had 4 of the top 5 teams in the NFL this year. CHI maybe was #5. This is why we need a single table. The divisional system is complete horse doo doo. I bet there are at least 8 teams that would have been given a closer point spread to the Dolts in that game. And maybe 3 that would have been favored over them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites