gram 0 Posted September 21, 2009 i am trying to pick up both of these, but i have 1st opportunity in the waiver order to garentee one. which one would you go after 1st... my view is steve smith=safe manningham=roll of the dice any thoughts??? will answer yours! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
garychristian 0 Posted September 21, 2009 just like you said ....s. smith mr. reliable ....m&m the new plax that either gets less or more points than s.s. thax for mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrbdmb 28 Posted September 21, 2009 Agree with your thoughts. Smith = more reliable week-to-week, MM = more upside. There is also a chance that MM loses targets when Hicks and Hixon are back from injury, though I don't think Coughlin is dumb enough keep him as anything other than the #2 based on his past two games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CajunBadger 6 Posted September 21, 2009 Will make it a consensus. Smith provides the consistency while Manningham could (and I stress could) turn into their "home run hitter." Two weeks in Manningham looks good, but think it's too early to know for sure. And if in a PPR league, would think the nod is even stronger for Smith. Please see mine: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=351085 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dumbassmax2001 0 Posted September 22, 2009 Make it one more vote for Steve Smith. Thanks for answering mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
All_The_Way 0 Posted September 22, 2009 here is a little more reassurance. I'm doing the same thing and have the same idea. Smith will be more consistent and manningham will be huge one week and them may have 4-5 points the next. I'm taking smith and dropping lance moore to do so. in another league i'm debating dropping devin hester and getting smith. Put I think hester has some potential.. plus we get the points for kick returns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
