ktuoms 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Lynch and Blount for Forte and Bowe... or Michael Bush and Fred Jackson for Pierre Thomas and Ivory My receivers: Miles Austin DJax Calvin Johnson Hines Ward My Running backs: Turner, Rice, Lynch, Fred Jackson, Michael Bush, and Blount Will answer yours Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Apollo Creed 9 Posted October 8, 2010 i actually wouldnt trade lynch or Fred Jackson and Michael bush... Lynch is on an improved team with better coaching and he is light years ahead of forsett IMO. Also, why trade a now healthy bush and Fred jackson for and INJURE PIERRE and Ivory (rookie) on a team that likes to throw and in a RBBBC.. i wouldnt trade or wait alittle while... was never too high on CHI offense and with cutler out it should be any better... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chromite 0 Posted October 8, 2010 I agree. Not to mention, you would be giving up the RBs on two teams, for whichever RB is playing for one team. If you make the trade, go with the one that gives you the most options. Also, the possible use of McCluster is going to keep offenses from keying on Bowe (provided Cassel can play consistently). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ktuoms 0 Posted October 8, 2010 I agree with what you are both saying but we do start 3 Running backs so that was why I thought Forte or Thomas would be a better 3rd back than what I have now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
da_mane_man 1 Posted October 8, 2010 i'd take pierre. he's the best player in the deal, although your guys aren't that bad. i think bush and jackson have a lot of value. bowe and forte are not dependable whatsoever. i'd stand pat instead of making that trade My link Share this post Link to post Share on other sites