Is this collusion or good management?

[gcgopher 0]

Say two teams make a trade whereby one teams trades a WR for a WR/RB, however, because of bye week considerations, they agree after bye week to swap the WR that came over in the WR/RB deal for another WR. Basically, renting a player then trading them back. Collusion or no. Really not sure and thought I'd toss it to the vets on here.

[erknjerk 4]

Collusion, duh.

[Law 220]

If you're not sure this is collusion or not, you should find a dictionary!

 

Honestly, I don't know why similar scenarios are posted every week or so. Trade-backs like these are ALWAYS collusion. Always and without doubt or question.

[The Unknown Poster 0]

If you're not sure this is collusion or not, you should find a dictionary!

 

Honestly, I don't know why similar scenarios are posted every week or so. Trade-backs like these are ALWAYS collusion. Always and without doubt or question.

 

 

Agreed. How is this not? You're combining two teams, essentially. This shouldn't even be a debate.

[Old School 360]

Let me guess. You are one of the teams involved in this act.

And you are wondering why the other owners are either calling you out, or why the trade back was vetoed.

 

It's collusion

It's cheating

NO worthwhile league would ever allow it.

 

 

HTH

[Big Blue 06 195]

Seriously, how many times will we see this same thread on this board? This is the definition of collusion, go kill yourself. No tradebacks, no givebacks.

[gocolts 300]

Let me guess. You are one of the teams involved in this act.

And you are wondering why the other owners are either calling you out, or why the trade back was vetoed.

 

It's collusion

It's cheating

NO worthwhile league would ever allow it.

 

 

HTH

This