Strike 6,058 Posted January 22, 2012 Why, so you can try to weasel out of your idiocy as usual? I said you don't know what impeachment means and I proved it. Hell, you don't even know what it takes to get someone disbarred. You're a focking idiot, a lying sh1thead, and you should do everyone a favor and step in front of a bus. TIA Apparently all it takes is an indictment. :banana: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted January 22, 2012 How so...did you give him a roofie? No, I woulda used "drugged", English major. Drug is commonly used in the South as a form of dragged. We also use "fixin" a lot, but has nothing to do with anything that is broken. Kinda like using 'Youse guys' in the NE (or however youse guys spell it), or Chowderheads adding an "R" to every other word. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted January 22, 2012 I never said that he was. You're the dooshbag saying his impeachment was the equivalent of being indicted. I just pointed out that no one has ever been suspended or disbarred for simply being indicted. Please show me where a lawyer has been disbarred for being indicted. Does this count? The New Jersey State Supreme Court on Wednesday suspended the law license of Philadelphia lawyer Michael Kwasnik, who was charged in a state grand jury indictment in November with stealing $1.1 million from a Cherry Hill widow. Or this?LAWRENCE — The state Supreme Judicial Court has indefinitely suspended the law license of a local attorney at the center of a long-standing dispute over 1970s-era videotapes of John Lennon and Yoko Ono. John Kenneth Buck, whose office is at 375 Common St., Lawrence, has been ordered by SJC Associate Justice Francis X. Spina to stop practicing law by the end of this month; to sever all relations with his clients; and to file paperwork with the court proving that he has ceased all operations as a lawyer. Buck, who could not be reached for comment, is charged with forging the signatures of two local businessmen who owned the disputed videotapes so that the tapes could then be fraudulently sold to Yoko Ono. Google "law license supended for indictment"; there are many other examples. These semantic games are ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,058 Posted January 22, 2012 Does this count? Or this? Google "law license supended for indictment"; there are many other examples. These semantic games are ridiculous. It would help if you'd include links to make it easier to see the context of the cases you cite. For example, let's look at your Mr. Kwasnik's case: Kwasnik’s law license suspended in N.J.December 07, 2011 The New Jersey State Supreme Court on Wednesday suspended the law license of Philadelphia lawyer Michael Kwasnik, who was charged in a state grand jury indictment in November with stealing $1.1 million from a Cherry Hill widow. Kwasnik had been under investigation by state bar authorities and law enforcement officials for a variety of alleged ethics code and criminal violations involving his mostly elderly clients. A Cherry Hill based company for which he had served as general counsel, Liberty State Financial Holdings, filed for bankruptcy in July. Authorities say the company and its subsidiaries owe investors millions, but that it has no money to repay them. Kwasnik was arrested at a bus station in Alabama on Nov. 9, a few days after his indictment. Police say he was carrying cash, maps, a passport and other documents needed for travel outside of the country. So there's a lot more to it than simply an unprosecuted indictment. Not only was he indicted but he was a fugitive. I suspect his law license was suspended pending the outcome of his legal proceedings. In Clinton's case he accepted the suspension to avoid a trial in which he almost certainly would have been convicted. And he did not contest his disbarment by the SCOTUS. There's a huge difference. I agree that the semantic game is ridiculous but this case only adds to the gamesmanship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted January 22, 2012 It's amazing these clowns have survived without suffocating by having Clinton's dingus in their throat for the past 20 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 8,161 Posted January 23, 2012 It's amazing these clowns have survived without suffocating by having Clinton's dingus in their throat for the past 20 years. Better than having Ronald McReagan's dingus for 30? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted January 23, 2012 Better than having Ronald McReagan's dingus for 30? Are you asking that as a "moderate Republican" you should be concerned with having Reagan's dingus in your throat for 30 years? I didn't know political affiliation dictated who you did that to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 8,161 Posted January 23, 2012 Are you asking that as a "moderate Republican" you should be concerned with having Reagan's dingus in your throat for 30 years? I didn't know political affiliation dictated who you did that to. I haven't suck Ronald McReagan's dingus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted January 23, 2012 I haven't suck Ronald McReagan's dingus. I see what you did here. You used the present tense "suck" to fool everyone, cuz ya know, Reagan is dead and all. Nice try Repube. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 8,161 Posted January 23, 2012 I see what you did here. You used the present tense "suck" to fool everyone, cuz ya know, Reagan is dead and all. Nice try Repube. Shut the fock up poosay libtard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites