FF Tracker 0 Posted August 2, 2012 I'm in a 14-team non-PPR with 6 pts all TDs. QBs get 1 pt per 20 yards and 10 pts for 350+ games, which makes them a premium. RBs/WRs get 10 pts for 175+ games. Also, you get 9 points for non-positional TDs, so Cam Newton would get 9 for a rushing TD, Darren Sproles 9 for a receiving, DeSean Jackson 9 for a rushing, etc... We drew #s to pick the spot where we draft and I drew the second choice. The first choice took the #3 pick. Where do you think I should choose to pick in a 14-team with that setup? I'm thinking of 5-6 range which would guarantee me an elite RB or QB, but QBs tend to fly off the board in this league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skinsrule05 30 Posted August 2, 2012 With QBs being that valuable I would probably go with 4. Take Rodgers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,653 Posted August 2, 2012 I'm in a 14-team non-PPR with 6 pts all TDs. QBs get 1 pt per 20 yards and 10 pts for 350+ games, which makes them a premium. RBs/WRs get 10 pts for 175+ games. Also, you get 9 points for non-positional TDs, so Cam Newton would get 9 for a rushing TD, Darren Sproles 9 for a receiving, DeSean Jackson 9 for a rushing, etc... We drew #s to pick the spot where we draft and I drew the second choice. The first choice took the #3 pick. Where do you think I should choose to pick in a 14-team with that setup? I'm thinking of 5-6 range which would guarantee me an elite RB or QB, but QBs tend to fly off the board in this league. I would be going QB all the way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted August 2, 2012 With that scoring Rodgers is justifiably the #1 pick. I'd also look at Foster/Shady/Rice/Mathews as run/receiving scoring beasts. If you take 4 or 5 you're going to get one of the top 3 RBs or a top flight QB. Same can't be said if you draft any later than 8. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Mueller 146 Posted August 2, 2012 Considering the scoring system, in 2011: Rodgers had 3 games over 350. Matthew Stafford had 5 games over 350. Tom Brady had 5 games over 350. Drew Brees had 8 games over 350. I might look to take one of those guys nearer to the end of the first round and pair them up with a better RB1. Just food for thought. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,653 Posted August 2, 2012 I would draft Tebow for sure in one of the later rounds and also target a WR like Harvin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Mueller 146 Posted August 2, 2012 I would draft Tebow for sure in one of the later rounds and also target a WR like Harvin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FF Tracker 0 Posted August 3, 2012 Considering the scoring system, in 2011: Rodgers had 3 games over 350. Matthew Stafford had 5 games over 350. Tom Brady had 5 games over 350. Drew Brees had 8 games over 350. I might look to take one of those guys nearer to the end of the first round and pair them up with a better RB1. Just food for thought. See, I think those 4 and Newton (14 rushing TDs in a 9-pt rush TD league) could end up being the top 5 picks. If that's the case, do I take #5 and take who falls or draft a RB in 5-7 range like Foster/McCoy/Rice and hope a good QB falls. Last year it was a 12-team league and 7 QBs went in the first 2 rounds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites