Redzonehog 14 Posted September 10, 2013 From what I understand, Coughlin is not giving up on Wilson, and I think he's a lot better than Miller. Would that trade work straight up, or would I have to throw in some change? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcmmidwest 99 Posted September 10, 2013 Yes if the Wilson owner is stupid enough to do it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted September 10, 2013 I'm not sure I get the point of this right now. Why would the other owner want to do this? Why would you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrMantisToboggan 5 Posted September 10, 2013 BC the giants have a better offense yes I would Some "experts"(matt money smith) are talking Daniel Thomas as a must add but meh. IDK if I'd go that far Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redzonehog 14 Posted September 10, 2013 I'm not sure I get the point of this right now. Why would the other owner want to do this? Why would you?Why would the Wilson owner want to? No clue...that's why I'm asking if it would work. Why would I want to? Well....I did just say I think Wilson is the better player and Coughlin has not given up on him. About the furthest from rocket science I could imagine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mgs316 14 Posted September 10, 2013 I don't think anyone would give up Wilson for miller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redzonehog 14 Posted September 10, 2013 I don't think anyone would give up Wilson for miller.Thanks, but what I wanted to know was, should I try? According to your response, I'm assuming yes. On the other hand, Miller could blow up against Indy next week and Wilson could ride the bench the rest of the season. Did you think about that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob Ross 55 Posted September 10, 2013 That's like trading dried up paint for dried up paint. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redzonehog 14 Posted September 10, 2013 That's like trading dried up paint for dried up paint.So what your saying is, the worst I could lose is.............................wait for it.............................dried up paint? The thought alone gives me chill bumps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5Year1 23 Posted September 11, 2013 Wilson has a chance to be a total bust this year, but at least you didn't draft him as an RB1 or 2. Those people are looking at being totally screwed. I would take the chance because the price is cheap, but you'd better have a back up RB or 2 to stick in if he turns into a pumpkin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stifler 2 Posted September 11, 2013 I was offered Wilson/Spiller for Sproles/SJax and am not sure I am gonna take it. At least I know what I am getting with Sproles and Jackson. And yes, it is the "Wilson" part of the trade that I don't like...too much risk. However, I would take Wilson's risk over Lamar Miller's risk any day of the week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steelers2101 7 Posted September 11, 2013 I was offered Wilson/Spiller for Sproles/SJax and am not sure I am gonna take it. At least I know what I am getting with Sproles and Jackson. And yes, it is the "Wilson" part of the trade that I don't like...too much risk. However, I would take Wilson's risk over Lamar Miller's risk any day of the week. I'd probably roll the dice and jump all over that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites