jrbdmb 28 Posted October 14, 2016 I've got an offer of my Antonio / Duke Johnson for Marvin Jones / Lamar Miller. Other than Antonio I'm meh at WR: Fitz, Sammie Coates, and Tyrell Williams. (Lost both Decker and Watkins to IR.) But my RBs are brutal: Jeremy Hill, Jon Stewart, Duke, and Dwayne Washington. Is it worth giving up the best WR in the game to get much better at RB? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimaveli 119 Posted October 14, 2016 It's tough. For this to work you have to fully believe in lame-r Miller to get it together and be a top 15 rb most weeks and a top 5 a few weeks. You have to believe the same thing about sweet sweet Marvin Jones. And even then, a tear would roll down your cheek every time Antonio drops a 30 and outscores both Miller and Marvin in a week. Its close and logical but I'm still not ready to advocate giving up Brown without it being a more clear haul. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrokh 608 Posted October 14, 2016 I'd want a better RB for antonio one of the top 5 guys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,158 Posted October 14, 2016 Miller hasn't been much this season. Nope I'm not trading Brown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcgruber 17 Posted October 14, 2016 i would never give up brown, only trade for brown. the trade would have to be pretty lopsided for me to even consider it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kobe808lak 7 Posted October 14, 2016 If it was something like Jones + Shady or Jones + Gurley then I would. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrbdmb 28 Posted October 14, 2016 Yeah, even though I think the trade is fairly even I know you almost always want to trade *for* the best player in the deal, not trade *away* the best player. Not that I'm getting garbage back, but I guess if someone wants Antonio that much they need to overpay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites