WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted September 4, 2017 Its obvious how I voted but im going to champion the cause for keeping things as they are stated in the bylaws. We had some random changes to those rules that didn't benefit the entire league and now we are voting on how to proceed moving forward (which makes sense but really should it have come to this?) basically voiting to say that in the future, the random handling of IR was okay. To me, the whole point of getting players off IR and onto the 22 man roster before making cuts and then drafting to get back to 22 is a very simple and easy way to do things. If someone gets placed on IR during our draft, you have to carry them until the draft is over. Then you can place them on IR and make a waiver claim. maybe it makes you think twice before drafting a player you know is on IR, because you wont automatically get a free pick. just my 7 cents. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
worm 36 Posted September 7, 2017 I'll go on the record and say I voted the same way. It basically keeps things even, 22 players per team to start with no matter what, and it does bring up some strategic challenges which I think is part of the fun of dynasty leagues. And on another note...HAPPY 2017 NFL SEASON!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted September 9, 2017 What happened was that after we'd voted to incorporate IR, we never had this discussion about how it should affect players injured before the draft until now. This isn't the first time we've seen it, just the first time the discrepancy was noted. The season before last, I'd green lighted this with Kelvin Benjamin. Right now it's 3-3-2. Focking sucks if it ends in a tie, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,472 Posted September 9, 2017 What happened was that after we'd voted to incorporate IR, we never had this discussion about how it should affect players injured before the draft until now. This isn't the first time we've seen it, just the first time the discrepancy was noted. The season before last, I'd green lighted this with Kelvin Benjamin. Right now it's 3-3-2. Focking sucks if it ends in a tie, 4-3-2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
worm 36 Posted September 22, 2017 So it will be allowed? If so, there should be a caveat that you can't draft a player on IR, place them in an IR slot immediately, and get another draft pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted September 22, 2017 I believe 4-3-2 results in NO IR during draft Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted September 26, 2017 So it will be allowed? If so, there should be a caveat that you can't draft a player on IR, place them in an IR slot immediately, and get another draft pick. No, of course not. You could fill the spot in FCFS waivers after the draft though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted September 26, 2017 I believe 4-3-2 results in NO IR during draftWhat? Why would it mean that? What bothers me is only seven people weighed in an opinion, two punted, five didn't even take the time to punt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,675 Posted September 26, 2017 What? Why would it mean that? What bothers me is only seven people weighed in an opinion, two punted, five didn't even take the time to punt. Sorry I got option A and B confused. Either way IR during the offseason and draft is stupid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
