Bills at Chiefs: Divisional Round Discussion

[nobody 2,934]

Oh.  That's vicious to you? 

You never struck me as the sensitive type.  I thought the need for validation was schtick.  

[AxeElf 787]

Just now, nobody said:

Oh.  That's vicious to you? 

You never struck me as the sensitive type.  I thought the need for validation was schtick.  

Are you laboring under the misapperception that Axe Elf made this Twitter post under a nom de plume?

Because it wasn't me.

[nobody 2,934]

I was laboring under the impression that someone who thinks laughing at a bad take on twitter is vicious might be too sensitive.

[AxeElf 787]

32 minutes ago, nobody said:

I was laboring under the impression that someone who thinks laughing at a bad take on twitter is vicious might be too sensitive.

Well, you were saying things like "You guys crack me up," as if you were talking to the author of the tweet.  But then you mocked the idea of being bitter about "people who are amazed by common sense," which sounded more like you were addressing people on this board.  And then when I observed that you seemed awfully critical about this, you labeled me as too sensitive, as if I had somehow been the target of your criticism all along.

So whatevs, man...  It's professional football.  It's "high level stuff" by definition.  If you're not impressed, so what?  I'm unimpressed by your failure to appreciate one of the great moments in NFL history.

[nobody 2,934]

Did anyone ever stop to ask why the Bills would be defending the sideline when there were only 13 seconds on the clock and the Chiefs had 3 timeouts?

 

[AxeElf 787]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

Did anyone ever stop to ask why the Bills would be defending the sideline when there were only 13 seconds on the clock and the Chiefs had 3 timeouts?

Apparently Kelce did.