Evans or Foreman or?

[himmystyles 30]

Full ppr. In first by a big margin and currently own foreman.  Have 2nd waiver priority in 12 man league.  I also own kyren Williams.  
 

would you use priority on Zach Evans, especially with rivers out and owning Williams?  If so, I would need to cut foreman.  Other option is picking up roschon Johnson and cutting foreman.

[Showboat 252]

I think I'd go for Evans, especially if you have K.Williams.  Picking between Foreman and Johnson before there is any clarity on how close Johnson is to returning creates more uncertainty IMO.

[weepaws 3,158]

Not giving up priority 2 for one week.  I would keep the pick and Foreman imo.  

[Chickie 74]

Actually prefer Reynolds > Evans, notwithstanding Gibbs and Williams. LA just signed a slew of RBs. If Williams doesn’t play, not sure Evans is the #1 with all the help they just brought in. ( DHendu, Royce Freeman and Gaskin). That doesn’t sound like a whole lotta confidence in Evans. Plus Williams could play. 

[Showboat 252]

11 hours ago, Chickie said:

Actually prefer Reynolds > Evans, notwithstanding Gibbs and Williams. LA just signed a slew of RBs. If Williams doesn’t play, not sure Evans is the #1 with all the help they just brought in. ( DHendu, Royce Freeman and Gaskin). That doesn’t sound like a whole lotta confidence in Evans. Plus Williams could play. 

Well, the Rams previously had 4 RBs (3 on the active roster and one on the practice squad).  They basically brought in Henderson and Gaskin to get back to 4 healthy RBs.  Maybe this means that they think that the Williams injury could linger longer than they are saying publicly.  It is certainly possible that Rams go with more of an RBBC or hot hand approach, but it makes more sense that they give the rookie they drafted the first shot to see what he can do rather than hand the job to some journeymen JAG.  I'd say Evans is a reasonable gamble, but I could see preferring Reynolds if Monty and Gibbs are both out.