Pimpadeaux 2,406 Posted November 17, 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/16/politics/supreme-court-rules-against-florida-anti-drag-law Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted November 17, 2023 Sub-headline I read said something to the effect "3 justices voted to uphold law". I must have ESPN, cause I just knew who they were before I even read the article. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,827 Posted November 17, 2023 The article says SCOTUS chose not to hear the request to block the injunction while it plays out in lower courts. If correct, does this constitute "booting?" 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pimpadeaux 2,406 Posted November 17, 2023 Just now, Mike Honcho said: Sub-headline I read said something to the effect "3 justices voted to uphold law". I must have ESPN, cause I just knew who they were before I even read the article. Of course, the MAGAturds here didn't see it because it Fox News buried it. Bury what they don't want to see. I don't see it on Newsmax at all. It's on the front page of the impartial and facts-based Associated Press. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,832 Posted November 17, 2023 15 minutes ago, jerryskids said: The article says SCOTUS chose not to hear the request to block the injunction while it plays out in lower courts. If correct, does this constitute "booting?" No. And you’re correct it’s only a temporary victory for the nightclub.. But in reality it’s probably indicative of a full victory in the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites