Trump and Egypt Cashola

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

Do you ever say anything intelligent? I haven't seen it yet. 

I assume you and @RLLD are concerned about the Egypt money and Trump and have written to your Congressman.

[RLLD 4,231]

17 hours ago, thegeneral said:

There is no evidence that is damning, this could go on forever. You can just say that.

That is fine I suppose but you wrote as if the deep state and the “patience professionalism” of Republican goobers in Congress are what has stopped Biden from being impeached and put in jail

And yet, this is standard practice, you do not always immediately charge.  I am actually fine with that.  Because...and you should really appreciate this....if you move forward with insufficient evidence.....your stuff gets tossed like they are tossing out the things they weaponized at Trump....

[RLLD 4,231]

17 hours ago, thegeneral said:

I assume you and @RLLD are concerned about the Egypt money and Trump and have written to your Congressman.

Of course, you cannot paint me with how you think....I am not suckling at the teat of a political party nor a politician....that is for you, not for me.   The act is what matters, so if its true then we hold ALL of those involved accountable.....even if it hurts our pursuit for political power....take your time digesting that last statement.

[thegeneral 3,214]

17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And yet, this is standard practice, you do not always immediately charge.  I am actually fine with that.  Because...and you should really appreciate this....if you move forward with insufficient evidence.....your stuff gets tossed like they are tossing out the things they weaponized at Trump....

So you have no evidence.

[thegeneral 3,214]

16 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Of course, you cannot paint me with how you think....I am not suckling at the teat of a political party nor a politician....that is for you, not for me.   The act is what matters, so if it’s true then we hold ALL of those involved accountable.....even if it hurts our pursuit for political power....take your time digesting that last statement.

I wasn’t on here but I’m sure this bothered you

[RLLD 4,231]

Just now, thegeneral said:

So you have no evidence.

The evidence is why they are pursuing it.  Wait....you think.....that all criminal investigations.....start with no evidence? Like, they just pull a name out of hat?  

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

The evidence is why they are pursuing it.  Wait....you think.....that all criminal investigations.....start with no evidence? Like, they just pull a name out of hat?  

I think after 6 years they’d produce something

[RLLD 4,231]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I wasn’t on here but I’m sure this bothered you

If she sold us out, yeah, of course...and it should bother you as well.  So investigate, by all means, that is all I have ever asked for.....that you find it unusual is really freaking crazy.....

[RLLD 4,231]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

I think after 6 years they’d produce something

Hell, some people are not prosecuted for 10 years.....its not unusual.  Hunter would have NEVER been prosecuted had it not been for one moral judge....

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Hell, some people are not prosecuted for 10 years.....its not unusual.  Hunter would have NEVER been prosecuted had it not been for one moral judge....

Maybe someday it will happen

[RLLD 4,231]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Maybe someday it will happen

I am willing to wait, to allow the system to operate as it should, without the abuses we have seen of late.  

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

I am willing to wait, to allow the system to operate as it should, without the abuses we have seen of late.  

Years of congressional investigations without producing anything except NewsMax articles.

[thegeneral 3,214]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

If she sold us out, yeah, of course...and it should bother you as well.  So investigate, by all means, that is all I have ever asked for.....that you find it unusual is really freaking crazy.....

You are certain Joe Biden is guilty, without evidence. Trump not guilty.

Makes sense!

[RLLD 4,231]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Years of congressional investigations without producing anything except NewsMax articles.

I don't care who reports on it, just because MSM has protected the Bidens rather well, avoided reporting on them or lied to protect them does not confront my insistence....not they Biden be prosecuted for the obvious RICO and tax crimes.....no....I want to know what our enemies bought from him.....

[RLLD 4,231]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

You are certain Joe Biden is guilty, without evidence. Trump not guilty.

Makes sense!

Why would you lie like that? I mean, more than once in this thread I have said prosecute both....everyone can see this....why lie?

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

Why would you lie like that? I mean, more than once in this thread I have said prosecute both....everyone can see this....why lie?

Prosecute Biden on what? What the hell 

Don’t repeat they are methodically building a case

These jackasses would love nothing more than to dump an impeachment trial on him. Republicans in Congress laugh at them knowing they are just useful stooges.

[RLLD 4,231]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Prosecute Biden on what? What the hell 

Don’t repeat they are methodically building a case

These jackasses would love nothing more than to dump an impeachment trial on him. Republicans in Congress laugh at them knowing they are just useful stooges.

Biden on selling what ever favors (or worse) for all that money funneling into those fake LLC's in his families name; corroborated by the Hunter laptop and whistleblower testimony.

YOU.....would certainly want to know if it were Trump.....AS WOULD I.....and yet....you lack any curiosity when it comes to Biden. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Biden on selling what ever favors (or worse) for all that money funneling into those fake LLC's in his families name; corroborated by the Hunter laptop and whistleblower testimony.

YOU.....would certainly want to know if it were Trump.....AS WOULD I.....and yet....you lack any curiosity when it comes to Biden. 

I am eagerly awaiting an actual trial. Not the “evidence” that people on the magic football board say they have.

[RLLD 4,231]

Just now, thegeneral said:

I am eagerly awaiting an actual trial. Not the “evidence” that people on the magic football board say they have.

Eagerly....I rather doubt that.  Your insistence to protect a political animal is a strange use of energy.  These people do not care about you.

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

Eagerly....I rather doubt that.  Your insistence to protect a political animal is a strange use of energy.  These people do not care about you.

Why the fock would I care if Biden goes on trial? 

Your idea that Republicans are somehow showing restraint, they actually care about building a case “the right way” is comical.

 

[RLLD 4,231]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Why the fock would I care if Biden goes on trial? 

Your idea that Republicans are somehow showing restraint, they actually care about building a case “the right way” is comical.

 

You have steadfastly defended Biden, its a strange way to behave. I assure you, he is not interested in your well being, not at all.

I point to the way Democrats have leveraged the legal system as improper, they have abused the systems.  They ran roughshod over how our systems are intended to function, to move as quickly as possible, to influence an elected....by the means of a legal persecution.  Right now, liberals dont much care....later....if the Republicans do it back....that sure will......and then, when the situation feeds your political positions....we can agree....

That the Republicans are taking their time and doing this properly, is EXACTLY what I expect.

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

You have steadfastly defended Biden, its a strange way to behave. I assure you, he is not interested in your well being, not at all.

I point to the way Democrats have leveraged the legal system as improper, they have abused the systems.  They ran roughshod over how our systems are intended to function, to move as quickly as possible, to influence an elected....by the means of a legal persecution.  Right now, liberals dont much care....later....if the Republicans do it back....that sure will......and then, when the situation feeds your political positions....we can agree....

That the Republicans are taking their time and doing this properly, is EXACTLY what I expect.

When someone says republicans have evidence of crimes but they are waiting to build a case I will chime in. Because that sounds absurd. 

Go ahead and do whatever to Biden. We can talk about it then. Right now it’s all for Twitter and sound bites. 

[RLLD 4,231]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

When someone says republicans have evidence of crimes but they are waiting to build a case I will chime in. Because that sounds absurd. 

Go ahead and do whatever to Biden. We can talk about it then. Right now it’s all for Twitter and sound bites. 

What I think will be the fun part is that right now Democrats, led by Schumer, are scheming up to try to setup a later takedown of Trump, but are effectively also setting up Biden....with this "no kings" excrement.....

As per normal, Democrats do as they please, constitution and norms be damned, with no regard for the later consequences. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

What I think will be the fun part is that right now Democrats, led by Schumer, are scheming up to try to setup a later takedown of Trump, but are effectively also setting up Biden....with this "no kings" excrement.....

As per normal, Democrats do as they please, constitution and norms be damned, with no regard for the later consequences. 

This would be showing he doesn’t care

Your Republicans aren’t hacks shtick is great tho. Maybe they just really suck at it.

[RLLD 4,231]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

This would be showing he doesn’t care

Your Republicans aren’t hacks shtick is great tho. Maybe they just really suck at it.

What would be showing who doesnt care.....about what? 

[thegeneral 3,214]

13 minutes ago, RLLD said:

What would be showing who doesnt care.....about what? 

Schumer would be setting up Trump, or Biden, or whomever to be not protected.

[RLLD 4,231]

9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Schumer would be setting up Trump, or Biden, or whomever to be not protected.

Well, I mean, Schumer is pointedly trying to build legislation to later take out Trump, that IS what he is up to.   They already tried to malign and manipulate existing law....didnt work....so now they want to create something new.  But what about later?  What about when it becomes possible to turn this weaponization on their THEIR candidate.....see, they arent thinking about that. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

Well, I mean, Schumer is pointedly trying to build legislation to later take out Trump, that IS what he is up to.   They already tried to malign and manipulate existing law....didnt work....so now they want to create something new.  But what about later?  What about when it becomes possible to turn this weaponization on their THEIR candidate.....see, they arent thinking about that. 

Trump is still working his way through the courts.

I thought we were all about getting to the bottom of everything with slow and methodical investigations. Go ahead. Investigate away!!

 

[RLLD 4,231]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Trump is still working his way through the courts.

I thought we were all about getting to the bottom of everything with slow and methodical investigations. Go ahead. Investigate away!!

 

Nothing I posted suggested there should be no investigations.   That is an odd thing to pretend I stated. You are tilting back into lying mode, and I encourage you to resist that pull.

Now, setting that irrelevant point aside.  This maneuver to create the weapon as Democrats are doing will create a weapon that can be used back on them. Now of course when they use it...it will be "good" and "moral" and "just"....and later when it us implemented back at them....it will be "wrong" and "amoral" and "misused"

[thegeneral 3,214]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Nothing I posted suggested there should be no investigations.   That is an odd thing to pretend I stated. You are tilting back into lying mode, and I encourage you to resist that pull.

Now, setting that irrelevant point aside.  This maneuver to create the weapon as Democrats are doing will create a weapon that can be used back on them. Now of course when they use it...it will be "good" and "moral" and "just"....and later when it us implemented back at them....it will be "wrong" and "amoral" and "misused"

I have only said you have this absurd idea that the only thing keeping Republicans from skewering any political rival is their sanctity of the law and their methodical nature as opposed to they don’t have shet

[RLLD 4,231]

4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I have only said you have this absurd idea that the only thing keeping Republicans from skewering any political rival is their sanctity of the law and their methodical nature as opposed to they don’t have shet

Except I did not say any of that..... that is a lie, you are lying again.  Everyone can see what I posted, there is no value in lying....

Now, creating a weapon as the Democrats are doing might seem great today, yay....winning....we are going to take down our rival....sure...it might seem super....but later, it might not....that is all I am saying....

[thegeneral 3,214]

31 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Except I did not say any of that..... that is a lie, you are lying again.  Everyone can see what I posted, there is no value in lying....

Now, creating a weapon as the Democrats are doing might seem great today, yay....winning....we are going to take down our rival....sure...it might seem super....but later, it might not....that is all I am saying....

Look I’m reading your little book reports.

Tell me why again Republicans, have not say, brought up impeachment charges against Biden?

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Jared took billions off the Saudis. Why worry about a measly 10 mill?

[RLLD 4,231]

18 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Look I’m reading your little book reports.

Tell me why again Republicans, have not say, brought up impeachment charges against Biden?

Relevance?

[thegeneral 3,214]

17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Relevance?

It’s what we have been talking about for last couple pages. Republicans didn’t move to impeach Biden because they don’t have shet. If they did, they would have. 

[RLLD 4,231]

8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

It’s what we have been talking about for last couple pages. Republicans didn’t move to impeach Biden because they don’t have shet. If they did, they would have. 

Well if you cross-pollenate points of discussion, notably ones that are only loosely relevant then you will generate confusion.

[thegeneral 3,214]

12 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Well if you cross-pollenate points of discussion, notably ones that are only loosely relevant then you will generate confusion.

It’s been the same point now for pages. You said Biden is guilty, they have all the evidence. I asked why haven’t they done anything with it and here we are. 

[RLLD 4,231]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

It’s been the same point now for pages. You said Biden is guilty, they have all the evidence. I asked why haven’t they done anything with it and here we are. 

But I was discussing the maneuver to setup a later attack through legislation and how that can come back to them, two separate points...

[thegeneral 3,214]

39 minutes ago, RLLD said:

But I was discussing the maneuver to setup a later attack through legislation and how that can come back to them, two separate points...

So you agree that there isn’t anything to impeach or get Biden on then at the moment, right?

For the “No King’s” thing I don’t really know what they are proposing, but if it allows people to go after the Prez after they are out - fine by me. I don’t think it was going anywhere in Congress in any case.

[RLLD 4,231]

8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

So you agree that there isn’t anything to impeach or get Biden on then at the moment, right?

For the “No King’s” thing I don’t really know what they are proposing, but if it allows people to go after the Prez after they are out - fine by me. I don’t think it was going anywhere in Congress in any case.

JFC....how many times do I have to repeat myself> honestly....in this focking thread alone, I mean, seriously can you focking read or not?

RIGHT NOW.......there is only enough evidence to investigate further.....which is what is happening......if there was enough on hand to impeach.... now pay attention.......they would be IMPEACHING.....right.....nowwwwwwww

Since they are not IMPEACHING......right.....nowwwwww.......   there is only enough evidence.......to continue the investigation.

I mean, focks sake......    do I need to save this post to use it for the next time you pretend I never answered this motherfocking question????