Nobody focks with Dice. Dice does the focking.

[nobody 2,719]

16 minutes ago, Horseman said:

I'm no fanboy.  I liked Clay and thought it was funny at the time.  It's just that too many people just say stuff on this forum.  Google AI is just a click away, it's easier than ever to fact check yourself. 

I googled, Andrew Dice Clay biggest shows and didn't get any results, but in general I'm not a big fan of running to Google for every thought.

The point of interaction is to understand a person, faults and all.  I'm not interested in people's Google skills.  I actually like people's flaws.  It makes a person human 

But congrats on being able to copy and paste someone else's knowledge I guess.

[Horseman 2,581]

32 minutes ago, nobody said:

I googled, Andrew Dice Clay biggest shows and didn't get any results, but in general I'm not a big fan of running to Google for every thought.

The point of interaction is to understand a person, faults and all.  I'm not interested in people's Google skills.  I actually like people's flaws.  It makes a person human 

But congrats on being able to copy and paste someone else's knowledge I guess.

Does it always start with you claiming someone has a fault and then we have to figure out if it's true or not? 

[nobody 2,719]

13 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Does it always start with you claiming someone has a fault and then we have to figure out if it's true or not? 

Let's recap.

I think Andrew sucks.  I don't know why so many people liked his schtick 35 years ago.  I watched his standup when I was a teenager and I didn't get it.  It wasn't funny.  I saw the interview where Andrew claimed he was the biggest comic in the world.  Because I saw his comedy in the past and thought it was so obviously bad, I thought Andrew was doing the thing a lot of people do where they over exaggerate how great they were.  I even tried to google it ahead of time, but apparently didn't google it enough.  Your google searches apparently have proven me wrong.  Apparently he was a huge star (for some reason that I will probably never know).  

So I guess one thing since you don't want to drop it is I'm probably still right.  I just didn't care enough to argue.  Clay claimed he was selling out 80k-100k seat arenas multiple times a week.  First of all, the arenas he was playing aren't that big unless he was selling out football stadiums.  MSG only holds 20k and for a comedy show they likely cut the arena in half.  Note: these are my un-googled thoughts, so they may be subject to error.

The second thing is we are interacting.  I'm not interacting with Andrew.  The way it works is I say something.  You might disagree.  You'd offer up a different perspective.  We'd learn and grow, but instead of actually posting thoughts, you ran to google to try and confirm your thought and then copied and pasted what google AI spit out apparently.

Now you can go run to google and figure out what stadiums he played and copy and paste that.  I might be wrong.  Maybe he was the biggest thing in the world for a spot and he regularly sold out the Super Dome and the Big House and the Rose Bowl multiple times a week.  I'd love to know if that was the case since it's amazing to me that someone so devoid of talent could become that popular.

By the way, someone start a thread on how great the Beastie Boys are if you really want to get your google searches heated up.

[Horseman 2,581]

19 minutes ago, nobody said:

Let's recap.

I think Andrew sucks.  I don't know why so many people liked his schtick 35 years ago.  I watched his standup when I was a teenager and I didn't get it.  It wasn't funny.  I saw the interview where Andrew claimed he was the biggest comic in the world.  Because I saw his comedy in the past and thought it was so obviously bad, I thought Andrew was doing the thing a lot of people do where they over exaggerate how great they were.  I even tried to google it ahead of time, but apparently didn't google it enough.  Your google searches apparently have proven me wrong.  Apparently he was a huge star (for some reason that I will probably never know).  

So I guess one thing since you don't want to drop it is I'm probably still right.  I just didn't care enough to argue.  Clay claimed he was selling out 80k-100k seat arenas multiple times a week.  First of all, the arenas he was playing aren't that big unless he was selling out football stadiums.  MSG only holds 20k and for a comedy show they likely cut the arena in half.  Note: these are my un-googled thoughts, so they may be subject to error.

The second thing is we are interacting.  I'm not interacting with Andrew.  The way it works is I say something.  You might disagree.  You'd offer up a different perspective.  We'd learn and grow, but instead of actually posting thoughts, you ran to google to try and confirm your thought and then copied and pasted what google AI spit out apparently.

Now you can go run to google and figure out what stadiums he played and copy and paste that.  I might be wrong.  Maybe he was the biggest thing in the world for a spot and he regularly sold out the Super Dome and the Big House and the Rose Bowl multiple times a week.  I'd love to know if that was the case since it's amazing to me that someone so devoid of talent could become that popular.

By the way, someone start a thread on how great the Beastie Boys are if you really want to get your google searches heated up.

Didn't sell out stadiums -> Didn't sell out stadiums multiple times a week -> He did, but only did it only once -> He wasn't the biggest thing in the world.  

 

[nobody 2,719]

19 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Didn't sell out stadiums -> Didn't sell out stadiums multiple times a week -> He did, but only did it only once -> He wasn't the biggest thing in the world.  

 

Okay, so what are me and google arguing about?  All I was saying is that he billed himself as the biggest thing in the world (cosigned by Díck Clark apparently), and he said that he sold out 80k-100k seat arenas multiple times a week and I thought that was BS.  Can you go google search what the hell the problem is?