Will Ferrell: ‘If the Trans Community Is a Threat to You, Then It Stems From Not Being Confident or Safe With Yourself’

[kilroy69 1,248]

I think Will Ferrells brain is just damaged from all the crazy shitt he has done over the years and the liberal brainwashing he has had. He is clearly a pansy at this point in his life. 

[MDC 7,422]

25 minutes ago, RLLD said:

So then, your position is that if something is statistically small......that we should not worry about it?   I might be able to get behind that position, if you are then also willing to apply that logic elsewhere......are you?

Interesting question Ray. Is your position that statistically rare problems deserve the same level of concern as much more common problems? 

[RLLD 4,230]

45 minutes ago, MDC said:

Interesting question Ray. Is your position that statistically rare problems deserve the same level of concern as much more common problems? 

I am less inclined to have you question me, until you answer my question. Now, lets start again...

Should I be more worried about regular white males because they are statistically more likely to harm my daughter than a tranny, as you seem to have suggested?

[purdygood 352]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am less inclined to have you question me, until you answer my question. Now, lets start again...

Should I be more worried about regular white males because they are statistically more likely to harm my daughter than a tranny, as you seem to have suggested?

The odds of "anyone" hurting your daughter are pretty low as long as you teach her street smarts and situational awareness.  (Sorry to jump in)

[MDC 7,422]

13 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am less inclined to have you question me, until you answer my question. Now, lets start again...

Should I be more worried about regular white males because they are statistically more likely to harm my daughter than a tranny, as you seem to have suggested?

I figured you wouldn’t want to go down that road.  

To answer your question: Yes, you should be more worried about regular dudes potentially harming your daughter than trannies. Statistically speaking, that is far more likely. Worrying about a tranny victimizing your kid is like worrying that a drunk driver will get struck by lightning when he leaves the bar.

[MDC 7,422]

22 minutes ago, purdygood said:

The odds of "anyone" hurting your daughter are pretty low as long as you teach her street smarts and situational awareness.  (Sorry to jump in)

This guy knows. Tell her to keep her head on a swivel, she’s be alright.  

[purdygood 352]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

This guy knows. Tell her to keep her head on a swivel, she’s be alright.  

Don't they tell kids to look left, right, then left again when they cross a street anymore? I know kids are on their phones all the time now.    I've walked through some of the shadiest parts of SF, Oakland, Las Vegas and Los Angeles in the last year. I'm going to New York this weekend.  Keep one hand in your pocket. (Because then any bad guys wonder if you might have a weapon and they dont want anyone to fight back) (Make eye contact to let them know "i see you") And walk with a pace like you know where you are going.   Most "criminals" will leave you alone and wait for the next one. But the % of criminals is sooooo much lower than people think. 

[MDC 7,422]

5 minutes ago, purdygood said:

Don't they tell kids to look left, right, then left again when they cross a street anymore? I know kids are on their phones all the time now.    I've walked through some of the shadiest parts of SF, Oakland, Las Vegas and Los Angeles in the last year. I'm going to New York this weekend.  Keep one hand in your pocket. (Because then any bad guys wonder if you might have a weapon and they dont want anyone to fight back) (Make eye contact to let them know "i see you") And walk with a pace like you know where you are going.   Most "criminals" will leave you alone and wait for the next one. But the % of criminals is sooooo much lower than people think. 

I just walk where I’m going without making any eye contact or breaking stride. Thirty years in Philly and nobody focks with me. I must exude some type of pheromones that give off bad ass vibes.  

[purdygood 352]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

I just walk where I’m going without making any eye contact or breaking stride. Thirty years in Philly and nobody focks with me. I must exude some type of pheromones that give off bad ass vibes.  

Haha fair enough.  Yeah if you walk like you know where you're going.  And know what you're doing.  You're good.  Street crime preys on people who wander around and look clueless. 

[RLLD 4,230]

On 10/2/2024 at 6:35 PM, MDC said:

I figured you wouldn’t want to go down that road.  

To answer your question: Yes, you should be more worried about regular dudes potentially harming your daughter than trannies. Statistically speaking, that is far more likely. Worrying about a tranny victimizing your kid is like worrying that a drunk driver will get struck by lightning when he leaves the bar.

Great, so then if something is statistically low in terms of probability, we should not elevate it up to be some sort of problem, maybe then by extension we should instead talk about the problem that is statistically more important?  And this philosophy would then apply to all situations, right?

[RLLD 4,230]

On 10/2/2024 at 6:13 PM, purdygood said:

The odds of "anyone" hurting your daughter are pretty low as long as you teach her street smarts and situational awareness.  (Sorry to jump in)

Thats not what I am doing here, and MDC knows it.  See he will use this line of logic where it suits him, then refuse to apply it where it might tend to prevent him from holding on to one of his little positions that is indefensible when proper logic is used. So lets see if he refuses to use it still.

[MDC 7,422]

45 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Great, so then if something is statistically low in terms of probability, we should not elevate it up to be some sort of problem, maybe then by extension we should instead talk about the problem that is statistically more important?  And this philosophy would then apply to all situations, right?

A rare problem can still be a problem, but in general, the size/scope of the problem should dictate how much attention it gets.

A lot of Geeks were quick to point out that police violence against black people is rare and said the BLM protestors shouldn’t talk about it.

Some of those same Geeks are Very Concerned about a tranny taking a spot on their daughter’s sports team.  

[RLLD 4,230]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

A rare problem can still be a problem, but in general, the size/scope of the problem should dictate how much attention it gets.

A lot of Geeks were quick to point out that police violence against black people is rare and said the BLM protestors shouldn’t talk about it.

Some of those same Geeks are Very Concerned about a tranny taking a spot on their daughter’s sports team.  

Well no, you just told us that we should not worry about a problem that is statistically insignificant....so then....lets have people who worry too much about immigration problems silence themselves (since you think it should not be raised) and instead address the more statistically relevant source of danger to their daughters.

African Americans can do the same.  We all win because all the complaining about stupid stuff goes away, right?

[MDC 7,422]

32 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Well no, you just told us that we should not worry about a problem that is statistically insignificant....so then....lets have people who worry too much about immigration problems silence themselves (since you think it should not be raised) and instead address the more statistically relevant source of danger to their daughters.

African Americans can do the same.  We all win because all the complaining about stupid stuff goes away, right?

No, I said that the scope of the problem should generally dictate how much attention it gets.

You seem to think some rare problems (trannies in sports) deserve attention and others don’t (police violence).

I wonder why.  

[RLLD 4,230]

8 minutes ago, MDC said:

No, I said that the scope of the problem should generally dictate how much attention it gets.

You seem to think some rare problems (trannies in sports) deserve attention and others don’t (police violence).

I wonder why.  

Please clarify your usage of scope. Expand on this term so that we can better understand how it should be considered. 

And allow me to clarify, your moral gymnastics need to start here.  This is where your hypocrisy will have to be defended.

[MDC 7,422]

58 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Please clarify your usage of scope. Expand on this term so that we can better understand how it should be considered. 

And allow me to clarify, your moral gymnastics need to start here.  This is where your hypocrisy will have to be defended.

I’m interested to hear how your “concern” about trannies victimizing your daughter squares with your belief that BLM protestors had no point and should die in a fire.  

[RLLD 4,230]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’m interested to hear how your “concern” about trannies victimizing your daughter squares with your belief that BLM protestors had no point and should die in a fire.  

Nope, I already accepted YOUR premise.....that something statistically insignificant should not be elevated, we have common ground.

Now, you were only too happy to trot this out since your desire was to protect the position of the trannies.....so.....if someone also wants to leverage your approach, but instead call it out where it might tend to refute your argument toward African Americans.....since that is what your logic is doing.....are you willing to stand by that logic?

OR......could it be true.....that you only use it when it benefits YOUR preferred social agenda, but where that same logic might tend to imperil your other social agenda.....well, then it cant be used?

[MDC 7,422]

23 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Nope, I already accepted YOUR premise.....that something statistically insignificant should not be elevated, we have common ground.

Now, you were only too happy to trot this out since your desire was to protect the position of the trannies.....so.....if someone also wants to leverage your approach, but instead call it out where it might tend to refute your argument toward African Americans.....since that is what your logic is doing.....are you willing to stand by that logic?

OR......could it be true.....that you only use it when it benefits YOUR preferred social agenda, but where that same logic might tend to imperil your other social agenda.....well, then it cant be used?

It’s funny because you have it entirely backwards.

All I ever said about BLM was that they have a right to peacefully protest, even if they’re wrong. And that we should throw the book at the protestors who were committing acts of vandalism or violence.

On the other hand, your position was that the BLM protestors should die in a fire because they were complaining about a problem that’s extremely rare. But here you are, “concerned” about trannies victimizing our daughters.

So which is it Ray? Should we be concerned about rare problems or not?

I don’t expect a straight answer. 

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

It’s funny because you have it entirely backwards.

All I ever said about BLM was that they have a right to peacefully protest, even if they’re wrong. And that we should throw the book at the protestors who were committing acts of vandalism or violence.

On the other hand, your position was that the BLM protestors should die in a fire because they were complaining about a problem that’s extremely rare. But here you are, “concerned” about trannies victimizing our daughters.

So which is it Ray? Should we be concerned about rare problems or not?

I don’t expect a straight answer. 

Hmmm, ok, so then we also have common ground that the police are not the real problem for the African American community?

[MDC 7,422]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Hmmm, ok, so then we also have common ground that the police are not the real problem for the African American community?

I’ve answered at least 2 of your questions already. How about you stop deflecting and answer mine: Should we be concerned about rare problems or not?

[RLLD 4,230]

Are you able to answer my question?   so then we also have common ground that the police are not the real problem for the African American community?

[MDC 7,422]

11 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Are you able to answer my question?   so then we also have common ground that the police are not the real problem for the African American community?

No, the police are not the real problem for the AA community. Police brutality may be “a” problem, but it’s obviously not a primary one. I never said it was.

So should we be concerned about rare problems or not?  

 

[RLLD 4,230]

Just now, MDC said:

No, the police are not the real problem for the AA community. Police brutality may be “a” problem, but it’s obviously not a primary one. I never said it was.

So should we be concerned about rare problems or not?  

 

So then we have concurrence.  We now agree that we need not worry about decrying the impacts of the trannies on women.....and we need not worry about the impacts of policing on the AA community, since both are statistically insignificant.   

NOW......then......should we riot.....burn.....loot......march......or otherwise complain about these statistically insignificant things?

 

[MDC 7,422]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

We now agree that we need not worry about decrying the impacts of the trannies on women.....

I’m glad that I was able to lead you to abandon your dreams phony concern about grannies harming our daughters!

You’ve grown so much in this thread. 🥰 

[RLLD 4,230]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’m glad that I was able to lead you to abandon your dreams phony concern about grannies harming our daughters!

You’ve grown so much in this thread. 🥰 

Well, uhm.....I did that earlier....like what....four or five posts ago? So yeahhhhh, thanks for confirming you can read, I guess....

 

NOW......then......should we riot.....burn.....loot......march......or otherwise complain about these statistically insignificant things?

[MDC 7,422]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Well, uhm.....I did that earlier....like what....four or five posts ago? So yeahhhhh, thanks for confirming you can read, I guess....

Great! I’m so proud of you.  

[RLLD 4,230]

Just now, MDC said:

Great! I’m so proud of you.  

Thats great, I guess....

NOW......then......should we riot.....burn.....loot......march......or otherwise complain about these statistically insignificant things?

 

[MDC 7,422]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Thats great, I guess....

NOW......then......should we riot.....burn.....loot......march......or otherwise complain about these statistically insignificant things?

 

Well, we should never commit crimes like burning, looting, breaking into a federal building etc. at all.  

[IndyColtsFan 325]

Peefoam's elusive mom caught on video.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/bigfoot-captured-wild-viral-video-161513522.html

[seafoam1 3,023]

1 hour ago, IndyColtsFan said:

Peefoam's elusive mom caught on video.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/bigfoot-captured-wild-viral-video-161513522.html

Poor pimpledoosh. Wound up so tight. 

[RLLD 4,230]

On 10/4/2024 at 12:14 PM, MDC said:

Well, we should never commit crimes like burning, looting, breaking into a federal building etc. at all.  

More common ground, I hope your position also extends to your neighbors and small businesses in the area, since they have no bearing on any complaint you might have.

[MDC 7,422]

10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

More common ground, I hope your position also extends to your neighbors and small businesses in the area, since they have no bearing on any complaint you might have.

Why wouldn’t it? I don’t personally have any complaints.