TimHauck 2,905 Posted November 11, 2024 6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: So does that mean it materially and fraudulently represented itself to obtain a benefit rightfully designated for another? If it sues perhaps there is a more powerful counterclaim. Maybe… I’m sure there are many right wing lawyers that would love to take that case if so Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,331 Posted November 11, 2024 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: Maybe… I’m sure there are many right wing lawyers that would love to take that case if so Myself, I would represent either side in the debate and by the time it got to briefings and trial I would believe my side. I have the habit of convincing myself with my arguments, even when those arguments are initially made for others, against my personal views. I think judges and jurors can tell when you don't believe in your own arguments so convincing oneself is the first step towards successful litigation. Of course your arguments need to be cogent. If they are just insistence in face of undistupted counterfacts, well then one just seems the ass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
