Lisa Cook Mortgage Fraud Allegations

[Ron_Artest 2,830]

 

Another L for the Maga crowd

[TimHauck 3,536]

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/15/no-evidence-of-primary-residence-violation-by-fed-gov-lisa-cook-says-michigan-official.html
 

[The Real timschochet 7,562]

32 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/15/no-evidence-of-primary-residence-violation-by-fed-gov-lisa-cook-says-michigan-official.html
 

Crickets from the MAGA crowd on this one. And crickets on the totally embarrassing RFK Jr stuff. They’re too busy in the Kimmel thread repeating totally discredited Covid conspiracy theories, stuff about Hunter’s laptop, etc. 

[seafoam1 3,627]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Crickets from the MAGA crowd on this one. And crickets on the totally embarrassing RFK Jr stuff. They’re too busy in the Kimmel thread repeating totally discredited Covid conspiracy theories, stuff about Hunter’s laptop, etc. 

That shlt is laughable. Oh, but CNBC said it's true. 

You freaking liberal dolts will never know anything that is real. 

[TimHauck 3,536]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

That shlt is laughable. Oh, but CNBC said it's true. 

You freaking liberal dolts will never know anything that is real. 

Maybe learn to read.  It wasn’t CNBC that said it.

[seafoam1 3,627]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe learn to read.  It wasn’t CNBC that said it.

CNBC "reporting" on x posts. And you post that crap here. 

[Ron_Artest 2,830]

18 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Crickets from the MAGA crowd on this one. And crickets on the totally embarrassing RFK Jr stuff. They’re too busy in the Kimmel thread repeating totally discredited Covid conspiracy theories, stuff about Hunter’s laptop, etc. 

 

On 8/26/2025 at 11:03 AM, Strike said:

ROFLMAO.  She literally committed the same type of financial fraud you were giddy about Trump getting prosecuted for but you think she is a hero.  SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell ya!!!!

[TimHauck 3,536]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

Shh, Strike relies on only facts and data

[seafoam1 3,627]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Shh, Strike relies on only facts and data

Where as peetim relies upon cnbc and x posts. 

[shadrap 281]

26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Crickets from the MAGA crowd on this one. And crickets on the totally embarrassing RFK Jr stuff. They’re too busy in the Kimmel thread repeating totally discredited Covid conspiracy theories, stuff about Hunter’s laptop, etc. 

no crickets here.  So the tax assessor has her loan records?  Find that hard to believe.  How would he have her loan application and/or bank records?  

so inform us. 

[seafoam1 3,627]

1 minute ago, shadrap said:

no crickets here.  So the tax assessor has her loan records?  Find that hard to believe.  How would he have her loan application and/or bank records?  

so inform us. 

They can't answer. They only react to their liberal collective announcements. 

[Hardcore troubadour 16,285]

On 9/14/2025 at 10:37 AM, Dizkneelande said:

Lisa Cook’s preliminary “loan estimate” from May 2021 is not the binding mortgage agreement she signed in July 2021. The binding document—what she signed and swore to—said: “Borrower shall occupy, establish, and use the Property as Borrower’s principal residence … for at least one year … unless Lender otherwise agrees in writing.”

 

Kill shot

[shadrap 281]

4 minutes ago, shadrap said:

no crickets here.  So the tax assessor has her loan records?  Find that hard to believe.  How would he have her loan application and/or bank records?  

so inform us. 

The full extent of Cook’s representations to her lenders remains unclear, including any paperwork that may have changed the “vacation home” characterization by the time the mortgage was settled. Local officials in Georgia told Reuters that Cook never declared the home as a primary residence for tax purposes there.

That from your article.  You obviously read and decipher what you want to hear.

[shadrap 281]

31 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe learn to read.  It wasn’t CNBC that said it.

maybe read the whole thing and not just what you want to see.

The full extent of Cook’s representations to her lenders remains unclear, including any paperwork that may have changed the “vacation home” characterization by the time the mortgage was settled. Local officials in Georgia told Reuters that Cook never declared the home as a primary residence for tax purposes there.

[TimHauck 3,536]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Kill shot

Not really.   If the actual loan was the same lender (not sure if it was, most likely it was as those forms are often included in closing packets), that proves the lender was aware of her intentions and thus she has an argument it wasn’t fraud.

Of course even if it was just an estimate, while it doesn’t prove her innocence, it doesn’t prove her guilt either.

[TimHauck 3,536]

5 minutes ago, shadrap said:

maybe read the whole thing and not just what you want to see.

The full extent of Cook’s representations to her lenders remains unclear, including any paperwork that may have changed the “vacation home” characterization by the time the mortgage was settled. Local officials in Georgia told Reuters that Cook never declared the home as a primary residence for tax purposes there.

I never said it was definitive proof.  But further evidence that she made clear to various channels of her intentions.

Has there been any other evidence provided that it was fraud other than “2 mortgages that said primary residence within a month!!!”

[TimHauck 3,536]

 

 

[Ron_Artest 2,830]

On 9/7/2025 at 10:05 PM, jonnyutah said:

 The human head weighs 8 pounds. 

Also not true.

Also you are wrong. Again. 

Also my neighbor has three rabbits. 

🪖

[squistion 2,745]

From NYT subscriber content:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/21/us/supreme-court-fed-lisa-cook?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20260121&instance_id=169627&nl=breaking-news&regi_id=125207237&segment_id=214013&user_id=14502a7228c5a9b835a15627514bfe28

Supreme Court Appears Poised to Reject Trump’s Attempt to Immediately Fire Fed Governor

If the justices agree to keep Cook in place, Trump’s effort to reshape the Fed would be frozen for now.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed poised to reject President Trump’s bid to immediately remove Lisa D. Cook from the Federal Reserve board, with key justices expressing concern about undermining the longstanding independence of the central bank.

Justices from across the ideological spectrum questioned whether the allegations President Trump lodged against Ms. Cook — an unproven assertion that she engaged in mortgage fraud before taking office — were serious enough to allow the president to fire her.

They suggested it was premature for the court to resolve the case when there were still factual disputes over those allegations, and they sounded skeptical that Ms. Cook had received sufficient notice of Mr. Trump’s accusations and an opportunity to respond.

After about two hours of argument, a majority of the justices seemed likely to order additional proceedings, perhaps in the lower courts, meaning the Supreme Court’s ruling may not be the final word in the case. But if the justices agree to allow Ms. Cook to keep her job in the meantime, the result would be that the president’s effort to reshape the Fed would be frozen for now.

The court’s conservative majority has repeatedly allowed Mr. Trump to oust leaders of other independent agencies as he moves to expand presidential power and seize control of the federal bureaucracy. But the justices have signaled that the Fed may be different and uniquely insulated from executive influence because of its structure and history.

Key justices sharply questioned the Trump administration’s lawyer about the implications of the president’s position for the independence of the Fed and the economy.

Justices Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, who are often in the majority, noted that former Fed chairs and Treasury secretaries had warned against allowing the president to immediately remove Ms. Cook.

Accepting the president’s view, Justice Kavanaugh said, would “weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” he said, opening the door to future presidents trying to dismiss officials at the Fed “at will.”

The justices agreed to hear Ms. Cook’s case on an expedited basis and are expected to rule in the coming weeks or months. The final outcome of the case could determine how much latitude presidents have to influence the direction of the powerful central bank, which Congress intentionally tried to insulate from political pressures.

[TimHauck 3,536]

On 8/26/2025 at 11:03 AM, Strike said:

ROFLMAO.  She literally committed the same type of financial fraud you were giddy about Trump getting prosecuted for but you think she is a hero.  SHOCKED, SHOCKED I tell ya!!!!

lol at Mr “facts and data” making definitive statements based on Twitter posts from a nepo baby 

[Ron_Artest 2,830]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

lol at Mr “facts and data” making definitive statements based on Twitter posts from a nepo baby 

On brand for that fraud.  He's got a good case for most insufferable 2026